FGD and
DeNOx   NEWSLETTER     

                                                                                                            April 2004
                                                                                                                    No. 312

7^th ELECTRIC UTILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE

• North Carolina is a Leader in Emissions Reductions

• Minnesota Mirrors Western States in Air Quality Issues

• NO_x Emissions in the Western United States

• Silicate is a Cost Effective Option for Mercury Removal

• Why Mercury Compliance Will Cost Around $5000/lb Removed, Not $50,000/lb

• Mercury Emissions Reduction Via Total Particulate Control

• Acoustic Conditioning for Mercury Removal

• Don’t Overlook Advance Process Control for APC Equipment

FGD

• Alstom/Stone & Webster to Install 12 FGD Systems for Duke Energy

• B&W Now Has 6,500 MW of FGD Scrubbers under Contract in China

• The SO₂ Efficiency Bar Has Just Been Raised

• OTC States Agree Multipollutant Caps Necessary

• Phase II Field Testing of Advanced Mercury Control Technology

• North Dakota/EPA Agree on SO₂ Measurement

NO_x

• AEP is Moving Ahead with Scrubbers and SCR Construction

• PA Could Increase Fees for Landfilling Flyash

• Peerless to Supply SCR for CA Gas/Oil Producer

• SCR at Pleasant Prairie 2 Meets 90 Percent Reduction

• Carneys Point SCR Offers Some Catalyst Management Pointers

• Babcock Power’s STS^® Burner

• Fuel-Tech Announces NOxOUT Contracts Totaling $2 Million