FGD and DeNOx
NEWSLETTER
January 2020
No. 501
·
Trump Backs Trillion
Tree Initiative
MARKETS
·
U.S. Coal-fired Power
Generation will be Shrinking but Is Still Important
·
Coal-fired Power Generation Capacity will increase by Less than 1% Per Year
·
Coal-fired Power and FGD moving forward in the Philippines
INDUSTRY NEWS
Pace of Retirements of U.S. Coal Capacity Will Slow
Dry Sorbent Injection with Hydrate Lime Can Make Coal Plants More Cost Effective in the U.S.
Greek Court cancels Permit for proposed Coal Plant
Enforcement action Launched Over One of Eskom’s Coal Plants
Indian Ministry of Power Proposes Yet Another Pollution Deadline Extension
B&W Subsidiary Awarded Retrofit Boiler Equipment Installation
Contract for U.S. Power Plant
Expert Microsystems receives Award from the US Department of Energy
for Hybrid Analytics Solution to improve Coal-fueled Power Plant Operations
FGD Program making progress in India
MIT compares Chinese SO2 CEMS to Satellite Sata
Coal-fired Plants Around New Delhi Running Despite Missing Emissions
Deadline
Thermax Wins Rs. 431 Crore Order for Two Flue Gas Desulfurization
(FGD) Systems
Babcock & Wilcox Announces Renewal of Maintenance Contract for New
Mexico Power Plant
B&W Subsidiary to Supply Sootblowers for Power Plants in Asia
MHI and Hitachi Dissolve MHPS Partnership
Siemens to Equip Bajaj Energy Plant in India with Digitalization
Solutions
Indonesian Power Plant Will Operate with Advanced Air Pollution
Controls meeting Chinese Standards
EES Acquires Novinda’s Amended-Silicate Technology for Mercury Control from Utility & Industrial Power Plants
REGULATORY
Trump
Backs Trillion Tree Initiative
|
Technology |
Impact on CO2 levels |
|
Wind and solar |
Zero |
|
Coal combustion |
Increase |
|
Additional tree planting |
Decrease |
|
Equilibrium where number of new trees offset by decaying trees |
Zero |
|
Biomass combustion |
Zero |
|
Biomass combustion and sequestration |
Decrease |
So,
the flexible program incorporates additional tree planting until equilibrium is
reached. Then dying trees are substituted for fossil fuels. If more reduction is
needed, sequestration of the bIomass combustor emissions is undertaken
In
2006, the Billion Tree Campaign was launched, by the (UNEP) as a response to the
challenges of global warming,
The
Billion Tree Campaign was handed over to the Plant-for-the-Planet Foundation in
December 2011, an organization that has been participating in the Billion Tree
Campaign since 2007. In December 2017, following the discovery that there are
more than three trillion trees on Earth, the planting target was revised to a
trillion trees and the Billion Tree Campaign became the Trillion Tree Campaign.
One
estimate found that this amount of trees would cancel out the last 10 years of
CO2 emissions and sequester 160 billion tons of carbon. However,
the intergovernmental panel on climate change is even more positive. They
estimate that one trillion trees
will store an estimated 205 billion tons of carbon, or about two-thirds of the
carbon that humans have added to the atmosphere since the 1800s.
The
problem with this approach is that 30 years from now in 2050 there will be lots
of trees dying and emitting CO2. However, at that time the biomass
can be harvested and burned in power generators. If the 500,000 MW of new
coal-fired capacity, which is built is designed to be biomass ready, it can be
converted making each of the generators carbon neutral. If this CO2
is then sequestered, these generators would be as the UK describes it “sucking
the CO2 out of the air.” They would be the only generator type which
actually reduces CO2.
What
are the costs? The continuation of the coal-fired power program would net a
savings of $7.2 trillion over 30 years.
This saving would primarily be in a few Asian countries. The tree
planting program would cost $700 billion resulting in a $6.5 trillion saving
over the 30 years. For the period 2050-2080 the coal-fired power plants would be
converted to burn biomass and if necessary, also sequester CO2.
Sequestration would raise costs of electricity generation and make this approach
relatively more costly but only after 2050. Since biomass combustion and
sequestration is the only CO2 reduction option it can be employed if
necessary.
|
Activity |
2020-2050 |
2050-80 |
|
Tree Planting |
-$700 billion |
-$700 billion |
|
Saving with coal vs. more expensive generation options |
$7.2 trillion |
|
|
Net savings |
$6.5 trillion |
|
|
Biomass combustion with or without sequestration |
Biomass combustion without sequestration would increasingly be
implemented |
Sequestration would be an
alternative to other renewables and actually remove CO2 and
not just be neutral |
In 2050 these biomass ready coal-fired power plants would have already served their purpose as coal generators. Their conversion to biomass would ensure that the forestation approach is sustaining in terms of CO2 minimization. However, if there are major improvements in the cost of wind and solar and no need to reduce CO2 the plants could be retired. But since they would be the only alternative for dealing with dying trees, they will continue to be utilized.
Another option is to convert these plants to biomass combustion at an earlier
date. There is optimism that the cost of sequestration can be greatly reduced
through programs underway at Drax and other locations. If some of the most
pessimistic forecasters are right and climate change becomes a crisis, then the
biomass generation and sequestration becomes the only route to solve the problem
since it reduces CO2.
The
present CO2 level is 410 ppm. But a massive tree planting program
could have the effect of reducing CO2 by more than 1 ppm per year.
The net effect would be a 390 ppm CO2 level in 2050.
|
Initiative |
2020-2050
ppm CO2 |
2050-2080
ppm CO2 |
|
Existing |
410 |
390 |
|
New Coal and Other |
30 |
20 |
|
Tree Planting |
-50 |
0 |
|
Biomass Combustion at most former coal plants and Sequestration |
0 |
-30 |
|
CO2 level in the atmosphere at end of period |
390 |
380 |
After
2050 solar and wind will be more cost effective particularly if energy storage
methods advance. The need for new coal-fired plants will cease but there will be
other sources with the potential to add 20 ppm to the atmosphere in the
2050-2080 timeframe.
In
2050 there will be a very large quantity of fuel contained in elderly trees.
They can be harvested and burned as fuel. The biomass would replace coal in
existing boilers. They would not
emit CO2 to the atmosphere if there is sequestration. New trees which
replace the old trees will continue to remove CO2.So, this initiative
would more than offset man-made sources and the CO2 level could drop
to 380 ppm in 2080.
CO2
sequestration has been commercially practiced for decades. One use has
been enhanced oil recovery. CO is being piped long distances in many
areas. Presently it is economic only if it has a use such as recovering oil. The
UK believes that new carbon capture technologies will drive down the cost over
the coming years. But whether it is inexpensive or expensive the situation is
manageable in 2050 due to the ability to suck out the CO2. This
control provides flexibility. It will allow construction of coal fired plants in
India, the Philippines, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Vietnam and still achieve
climate change goals.
MARKETS
U.S.
Coal-fired Power Generation will be Shrinking but Is Still Important
The U.S. will continue to operate lower cost coal plants which can compete with
natural gas. U.S. coal consumption is likely to decline sharply again in 2020,
though the current list of planned and completed coal plant retirements suggests
that there will be fewer retirements than in 2019.
At 13,703 MW, 2019 marks the highest level of annual coal capacity retirements
in the U.S. since 2015, a new S&P Global Market Intelligence analysis of federal
data shows. The amount of coal capacity planned for retirement in 2020 is
expected to exceed the amount retired in each of 2014, 2016 and 2017. Another
retirement has already been announced.
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc. said Jan. 9th that it was
closing its 247-MW Escalante power plant in New Mexico by the end of 2020. Since
2014, U.S. power generators retired nearly 62,000 MW of coal-fired generation
capacity, with another 26,947 MW of retirements teed up through 2025.
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC forecast in a December 2019 report that about 70,000 MW
to as much as 190,000 MW of coal-fired generation is "economically at risk" from
the deployment of a "second wave of renewables" in the U.S. The research firm
said these projections exclude about 24,000 MW of coal generation already set to
shut down.
"We believe that carbon-heavy utilities that have not historically led the pack
in clean energy deployment will accelerate their earnings growth by pursuing a
'virtuous cycle': shutting down expensive coal plants and investing in cheap
renewables," the analysts wrote.
This statement has to be viewed in the context of timing. The U.S. coal fired
plants are all 35 to 70 or more years old.
By 2050 they will be 75 to 100 years old. Who would deny that a
100-year-old plant is not going to be as economical as a new one whether it be
gas, or coal? Relative to
comparison with solar and wind the assumption is that there will be
improvements. What about coal?
China says coal can be both cost effective and environmentally
competitive. They have a program to
make coal plants as green as gas
plants with conversion to ultra-supercritical
combustion and zero liquid discharge.
There will continue to be capacity retirements but at a slower pace than in
previous years. The retirements are throughout the country but less so in the
Midwest than the two coasts.


Regional retirements have been compiled by S&P

Cumulative retirements from 2014 through 2020
will be in excess of 60,000 MW or 10,000 MW per year.

Earlier retirements were mostly small old plants without FGD and SCR. Plants to be retired in the next six years include larger plants with FGD and SCR as well as particulate upgrades. But for example, Sherburne County constructed one of the first FGD systems around 1970. All of the plants are much older than the average plant in China or even Japan where replacement has taken place.

Coal-fired Power Generation Capacity will increase by Less than 1% Per Year
IEA
issued a report on December 19th predicting that global coal demand
is expected to decline in 2019 but remain broadly stable over the next five
years, supported by robust growth in major Asian markets, according to the
International Energy Agency’s latest market analysis and forecasts.
The weakness in coal demand this year results mainly from coal-fired electricity generation, which is set to experience its largest ever decline – over 250 terawatt hours (TWh), or more than 2.5 percent. This drop is led by double-digit falls in the United States and Europe, according to Coal 2019, which contains forecasts through 2024.
It is
too soon to say whether the expected global decrease in coal power generation
this year will be the start of a lasting trend. The IEA forecasts that renewable
sources will supply a major portion of the increase in global electricity demand
over the next five years. Electricity generation from coal will rise only
marginally over that period, at less than 1 percent per year — and its share
will decline from 38 percent in 2018 to 35 percent in 2024. This means coal
remains by far the single largest source of power supply worldwide.
Ultimately, global trends will depend largely on China, where half of the
world’s coal is produced and consumed.
In
Europe and the United States, coal power generation is sinking to levels not
seen in decades. Growth in solar PV and wind, low natural gas prices and
stagnating electricity demand have created a perfect storm for coal in both
regions, where coal plants retirements continue to take place. These trends will
continue through 2024, although the speed of the declines is expected to slow
unless coal comes under additional pressure from stronger climate policies or
lower-than-expected natural gas prices.
“Wind
and solar PV are growing rapidly in many parts of the world. With investment in
new plants drying up, coal power capacity outside Asia is clearly declining and
will continue to do so in the coming years.
Demand continues to expand in Asia. The region’s share of global coal power
generation has climbed from just over 20 percent in 1990 to almost 80 percent in
2019, meaning coal’s fate is increasingly tied to decisions made in Asian
capitals.”
The
report highlights that countries in South and Southeast Asia—such as India,
Indonesia and Vietnam—are relying on coal to fuel their economic growth. Natural
gas and oil have traditionally been the main sources of power generation in
Pakistan, but the country has commissioned 5 gigawatts (GW) of coal power
capacity since 2017, and another 5 GW is set to come online in the next few
years. In Bangladesh, where natural gas has long generated the bulk of
electricity supply, coal will gain share in the coming years, with 10 GW of
capacity in the pipeline.
In
2019, global coal power generation will experience the biggest drop ever and
coal power generation in India will probably decline for the first time in 45
years. The global picture, however, has not changed much. Coal is disappearing
in many advanced economies, but it remains resilient and is even continuing to
grow in developing Asia. The low coal power generation in India this year was
due to unusually low growth in electricity demand and exceptionally high
hydropower output. It is not at all clear that it will be repeated.
S.E
Asia: Coal demand in Southeast Asia
is forecast to grow by more than 5 percent per year through 2024, led by
Indonesia and Viet Nam. The region’s strong economic growth will drive
electricity and industrial consumption, which will both be fueled in part by
coal. South Asian countries are also in need of more electricity supply for the
growing populations, and they are often turning to coal to provide it. Pakistan
has recently commissioned over 4 GW of new coal power plants, with similar
capacity under construction. Bangladesh is about to commission the first unit of
the 10 GW it has in the pipeline.
China: This country is the world’s biggest coal producer and consumer.
Consumption will plateau around 2022 according to IEA. Stronger-than-expected
electricity consumption and infrastructure development have pushed coal use up
in the last few years. In the
forecast, the decline of coal use in the residential and small industrial
sectors continues because of air pollution concerns. Coal use in heavy industry
also drops, driven by structural changes in the economy as well as macroeconomic
conditions in the coming years. The
forecast sees coal power generation growing, although at a slowing rate. Its
share of the power generation mix is expected to fall from 67 percent in 2018 to
59 percent in 2024. Overall, coal demand in China plateaus by 2022 and then
starts to decline slowly. The trajectory outlined above remains subject to the
policies and targets that will be included in the Chinese government’s 14th
five-year plan (which will be released in 2020). Future coal demand will
potentially be affected by the government’s economic growth objectives as well
as its policies on nuclear power, wind and solar, and coal conversion projects.
While reducing air pollution and CO2 emissions will be policy
priorities for China, coal is expected to continue play an important role in
sustaining economic growth and guaranteeing energy security.
United
States: The shale gas boom is coal’s undoing. The federal government and
some coal-producing states still provide support for coal power plants, yet
coal’s destiny in the United States continues to be determined by the shale gas
revolution. Cheap and abundant natural gas combined with the climate policies of
many states will continue to squeeze coal out of the electricity market. In the
forecast, US coal demand declines by
almost 4 percent per year over the forecast period. Coal’s share in electricity
supply, which had been as high as 50 percent in 2007, declines from 28 percent
in 2018 to 21 percent in 2024. The decline in production is a bit lower because
of the resilience of exports. But the collapse of the European market and the
lack of export infrastructure on the West Coast limit future prospects.
South
Africa: The government’s Integrated
Resource Plan has brought broad clarity for the future of the country’s energy
sector, but other uncertainties are still hanging over the coal industry. These
include the financial difficulties of electricity utility Eskom, changes in coal
mine ownership, and the shift away from Mpumalanga, the country’s coal-mining
heartland, to other areas. Overall, South Africa’s demand, production and
exports are seen as remaining stable through 2024, but the factors mentioned
above could change that trend.
Coal-fired Power and FGD moving forward in the Philippines
With
the support of President Duarte, construction of coal-fired power is moving
ahead in the Philippines. It is expected to provide 50 percent of the energy
requirements by 2030. We have published an analysis in the Tracking System and
displayed at
http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/utility/subscriber/Profiles/Philippines.pdf,
We
have also published 319 articles in the Utility E-Alert and have referenced some
of them at the end of this article.
In
addition to coal-fired boilers there may also be construction of waste-to-energy
plants. Filipino infrastructure conglomerate
Metro Pacific Investment Corporation’s
proposal for a P22 billion (US$423 million) waste-to-energy plant is expected to
be approved this month in Quezon City, the country’s most urbanized district.
The project is expected to convert up to 3,000 metric tonnes of municipal solid
waste into electricity each day in a power plant with 36 megawatts of installed
capacity.
Relative to FGD, it appears that seawater scrubbing for the large coastal
imported coal plants and dry scrubbers for the CFB boilers used for the smaller
units will be the primary FGD types. Atimonan, with 2x 600 MW coal-fired
boilers, will start up in 2021 with seawater scrubbing.
Here
are the CFB units in the Visayas Grid. The TVUl started up in 2019 whereas the
other plants have been in operation for some years.

The
full display of power plants for
Visayas, Mindanao and Luzon are displayed at the following links.
http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/PDF/existing_power_plants_visayas_june_2019.pdf
http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/PDF/existing_power_plants_mindanao_june_2019.pdf
http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/PDF/existing_power_plants_luzon_june_2019_002.pdf
The
San Buenaventura Power Plant will be the first supercritical generation plant in
the Philippines. The plant is located in Mauban, Quezon, and will supply power
to the Luzon grid. It is owned by San Buenaventura Power Ltd (SBPL), a
partnership between Meralco PowerGen Corp. and New Growth BV. Meralco is the
largest electric distribution company in the Philippines, while New Growth BV is
a subsidiary of Thailand-based Electricity Generating
Public Co. The San
Buenaventura plant will have state-of-the-art emissions control technology, an
electrostatic precipitator for fly-ash capture and removal, and a seawater FGD.
Threatened by looming energy insecurity and with industries dependent on fossil
fuels, coal remains the prime power generation source for electrification in the
Philippines. It’s the only country in Asia that gained a 1-gigawatt increase in
power sourced from coal in 2019, which now accounts for 43 percent of the
national energy mix. Given new investments, coal’s share of the pie will reach
50 percent in 2030.

The
Philippines has a population of about 100.7 million, making it the 12th most
populous country in the world. The World Bank estimated GDP growth at 5.9
percent in 2015 and 6.8 percent in 2016, ranking the Philippines as one of the
strongest-performing Southeast Asian countries.
The
government’s credit rating has remained stable. The Philippines would replace
imported coal used in power generation with local output thanks to increased
production from the Visayas and new mines in Mindanao.
The
Philippines has 10,423 MW (US$20.8 billion) of largely imported coal expansion
in its current pipeline. This runs on top of a total of 900 MW of existing
coal-fired capacity. The Philippines imports 15 million tons of coal per year
(80 percent of coal requirements), 95 percent of which comes from Indonesia, a
source that has not always been reliable.
Of
the 316 million tons of Philippine coal said to be economically recoverable, the
majority is subbituminous coal and lignite. These types of coal have the least
carbon content and thus a heating value that is lower than that of imported coal
from Indonesia or Australia. Despite being a significant consumer of coal, the
Philippines is a very minor producer, producing an average of 8 million tons in
the last 6 years. Because the country produces only low-quality coal—which must
be burned in larger amounts than higher-quality coal for the same energy output—
and because most of its coal-fired power plants are built for imported coal, the
country must continue to import from other countries for its coal needs.
Regarding reliable supply of FGD lime and limestone, it looks as if there will
be little limestone used along with some lime. The seawater scrubbers will not
need additional reagent. International lime suppliers are moving into the
market.
Graymont is completing the
acquisition of the five Sibelco
lime plants and a number of limestone quarries on the east coast of Australia,
as well as lime plants in Malaysia and the Philippines. “With this transaction,
Graymont is well positioned to further expand its reach in the Asia-Pacific,”
stated President and Chief Executive Officer Stéphane Godin. “Mr. Godin noted
that “wherever Graymont operates, we aim to be the preferred supplier, employer,
and partner of choice—and Asia-Pacific is certainly no exception in that
respect.”
The
Rio Tuba plant is located in Palawan, Philippines and was built by
Unichamp Group, It is a $24-million
lime manufacturing plant in the Rio Tuba Economic Processing Zone in Bataraza,
Palawan. It was completed in 2015.
It is locked in a 15-year agreement
with Coral Bay Nickel Corporation (CBNC) for the supply of lime milk used in
metal processing. CBNC is a joint venture company of Rio Tuba Mining and three
Japanese shareholders holders: Sumitomo Metal Mining Company Limited, Mitsui
Company Limited, and Sojitz. The plant has the capacity to produce 400 metric
tons of reconstituted lime milk per day.
Upward Agro Industrial Corporation is
a manufacturer of high-quality lime (calcium carbonate), quicklime (calcium
oxide) and hydrated lime (calcium hydroxide) for the local market of Negros, the
Visayas and the rest of the Philippines. Lime and limestone products are a vital
part of national industries in sugar milling, steel manufacturing, energy,
environmental services, construction and mining, among others. Upward Agro lime
products makes sugar purer. Air cleaner and water clearer. They make steel
stronger. They make highways last longer. The company is also
targeting SO2 capture in power plant scrubbing.
Lime
production on Negros Island was almost entirely used for sugar milling in the
1960s. With the industrialization of the Philippine economy and the growth of
new industries, lime became essential in the mining, steel, paper, water
treatment and other sectors. From a small father-and-son enterprise in the
mountains of Negros, Upward Agro Industrial Corporation has since grown to be
one of the leading lime manufacturers in the Philippines. The enterprise became
incorporated on July 30, 1986. The company today supplies quality lime products
across the Philippines and employs over a hundred people.
H.T.
Mining Products Resources Corp. is one of the largest and leading lime products
suppliers in the Philippines. Its manufacturing facility is situated in a
readily accessible area in Barangay Tinandog, Atimon Quezon Province which
adjoins the Maharlika Highway. The company produces high quality products such
as: limestone, calcium carbonate, agricultural lime, quicklime, hydrated lime,
and calcium hydroxide which all carry the brand name "Limpog." It currently
operates four (4) kilns and three (3) high tech pulverizers with the total
production capacity of 120 tons per day for the local markets as well as export
markets catering mainly to steel manufacturing, chemical manufacturing,
construction, agricultural, water and waste treatment, paper industry, phosphate
industry, asphalt production, feed and seed distributors, soil stabilization,
sugar industry, tanning industry and others.
Here
is a list of operating coal-fired power plants in the Philippines.
|
Station |
Capacity (MW) |
Commissioned |
Community |
|
1294 |
1999 |
||
|
600 |
1998 |
||
|
511 |
2000 |
||
|
San Buenaventura Power Ltd. Co. Supercritical Coal Power Plant |
500 |
2018 |
|
|
728 |
1996 |
||
|
420 |
2018 |
||
|
651.6 |
2013 |
||
|
600 |
1984, 1995 |
||
|
APEC |
50 |
2006 |
|
|
SMC Consolidated Power Corp |
600 |
2016 |
|
|
Toledo Power Corp(Metrobank) |
246 |
1993 |
|
|
KEPCO-SPC Power Plant |
200 |
2011 |
|
|
STEAG GMBH |
232 |
2006 |
|
|
Lanao Kauswagan power station |
552 |
2017 |
|
|
167.4 |
Lapaz,Iloilo City,
Iloilo |
||
|
300 |
2015 |
||
|
Sultan Energy Philippines |
200 |
2012 |
|
|
SMI Power Corp. |
500 |
2016 |
|
|
Therma Visayas Inc. |
300 |
Cebu |
|
|
Total |
7432 MW |
|
The
Utility Tracking system contains a database of 900 power generators with 98
percent of the world’s coal generation planned and operating capacity including
industrial steam generators. Here is an excerpt from a sort by ranking of
planned MW from 2400 down to 2,000 MW.
|
COMPANY |
PLANNNED |
OPERATNG |
|
Zuma Energy |
2,400 |
0 |
|
Inter RAO |
2,318 |
8,372 |
|
MERALCO |
2,308 |
0 |
|
Gansu Electric Power Investment Group |
2,266 |
2,046 |
|
Jinneng Group |
2,172 |
2,843 |
|
PT Bukit Asam |
2,100 |
400 |
|
Texhong Group |
2,100 |
0 |
|
Mitsui |
2,062 |
186 |
|
Chubu Electric Power |
2,045 |
4,433 |
|
Sichuan Investment Group |
2,010 |
0 |
|
Beijing Ruixing Asset Management |
2,000 |
0 |
|
Jharkhand State Electricity Board |
2,000 |
0 |
The
Utility E-Alert can be searched for 319 articles on the Philippines. Here are
links to the first 10.
Sort
by relevance/Sorted
by date ▼
(1.)
UTILITY E-ALERT
...Rule
(ACE): Compliance and Innovative Solutions First Supercritical Coal-fired Plant
in the Philippines Case Study: How One Utility's Choice of a Control Platform
Improved Plant Operation Economic...
Terms
matched: - Score: 12 - 6 Dec 2019 -
URL:
http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY E-ALERT
1449/utility_ealert_1449_.htm
(2_
UTILITY E-ALERT
...
Close Coal Ash recycling Rate declines amid shifting Production and Use Patterns
COAL – WORLD Philippines' First Supercritical Power Plant expands Grid Capacity,
ensures stable, cost-effective Power Supply ...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 33 - 22 Nov 2019 - URL:
http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY E-ALERT
1448/utility_ealert_1448.htm
(3)
Untitled 2
...
to
cut flooding Risk Endesa writes off US $1.6 billion on Spanish Coal Plants
Philippines Energy Agency wants broader Tender Terms GAS TURBINES Siemens
supplies HL-class Power Island to South ...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 21 - 9 Nov 2019
- URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY
E-ALERT 1446/utility_e-_alert_1446.htm
(4.)
UTILITY E-ALERT
COAL – WORLD P56-billion PHL's First
Supercritical Coal-fired Power Plant switches on in Quezon, Philippines Eskom
ends corruption investigation into New Coal Plants Polish Government narrowly
re-elected but loses Senate ... Terms matched: 1 - Score: 29 - 18 Oct
2019 - URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY
E-ALERT 1443/utility_ealert_1443.htm
(5.)UTILITY
E-ALERT
...
. JGC is a designer of power plant systems with a recent order in the
Philippines. It also offers a dry scrubber system which has been successfully
employed in Japan ...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 4 - 4 Oct 2019 - URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY
E-ALERT 1441/utility_ealert.1441.htm
(6)
UTILITY
E-ALERT
...about
Coal export possibilities COAL – WORLD Royal Cargo delivers heaviest Piece of
Cargo for Philippines Power Plant Project AfDB to scrap Coal-fired Power
Stations across Africa Polish Coal Mining expansion ...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 21 - 27 Sep
2019 - URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY
E-ALERT 1440/utility_ealert_1440.htm
(7)
Untitled 2
...
Boiler) - Successful Commissioning done of ESP for all the units. QUEZON,
Philippines: 1x660 MW Power Plant – ESP – 1 No. of ESP - Successful...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 5 - 13 Sep 2019 - URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY
E-ALERT 1438/utility_e_alert_1438.htm
(8)
UTILITY E-ALERT.
its 105-megawatt (MW) coal-fired power plant in Talisayan, Zamboanga City,
the Philippines. The SRPI plant's shortlisted EPC bidders are Northeast No.1
Electric Power Construction Co....
Terms matched: 1 - Score: 5 - 6 Sep 2019 - URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY E-ALERT 1437/utility_ealert_1437.htm
...
at Iskenderun Power Plant Coal will account for 60 percent of the Power in the
Philippines in 2028 GAS TURBINE GE celebrates 25th Anniversary of Its 6F Gas
Turbine, secures...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 33 - 23 Aug 2019 - URL:
http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY E-ALERT
1435/utility_ealert_1435.htm
(10.)
UTILITY E-ALERT
...
that this project will contribute to the growth expected in the ASEAN region.
JGC Philippines Inc. was awarded a lump-sum turnkey basis contract for the Phase
II construction work...
Terms
matched: 1 - Score: 28 - 9 Aug 2019 -
URL: http://166.62.95.143/utilityalert/subscriber/UtilityE-Alert/2019/UTILITY
E-ALERT 1433/utility_ealert_1433.htm
Result Pages: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next
>>
Pace
of Retirements of U.S. Coal Capacity Will Slow
Since
peaking at nearly 318 gigawatts (GW) in 2011, U.S. coal-fired electric
generating capacity declined to 257 GW in 2017 after several coal power plants
retired. The U.S. Energy Information
Administration (EIA) undertook a study with Sargent & Lundy to improve
modeling for the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The results show the
relationship between plant retirements and a plant’s operating and maintenance
costs. According to the report, a larger share of plants with higher operating
and maintenance costs retired by 2018 than those with relatively low operating
and maintenance costs.

In
its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), released on January 14, the
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts that generation from
natural gas-fired power plants in the electric power sector will grow by 1.3
percent in 2020. This growth rate would be the slowest growth rate in natural
gas generation since 2017. EIA forecasts that generation from non-hydropower
renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, will grow by 15 percent in
2020 — the fastest rate in four years. Forecast generation from coal-fired power
plants declines by 13 percent in 2020.

Nuclear. Two nuclear plants totaling 1.6 GW are currently scheduled to retire in
2020. Indian Point Unit 2, located in New York, is scheduled to retire in April.
Iowa’s only nuclear power plant, Duane Arnold Energy Center, is scheduled to
retire in December.
EIA expects 42 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity additions to start commercial operation in 2020. Solar and wind represent almost 32 GW, or 76 percent, of these additions. Wind accounts for the largest share of these additions at 44 percent, followed by solar and natural gas at 32 percent and 22 percent, respectively. The remaining 2 percent comes from hydroelectric generators and battery storage.

Source: U.S. Energy Information
Administration, Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory
Dry Sorbent Injection with Hydrate Lime Can Make Coal Plants More Cost Effective
in the U.S.
Injecting DSI ahead of the SCR and the air heater can lower the SO3
concentrations enough to avoid maintenance and turn down issues. Injecting
enough sorbent further upstream in the flue gas means utilities can lower load
and capture waste heat that would typically escape from the stack. This also
gives utilities flexibility to run the coal-fired units at a lower load,
typically at night, and be more efficient.”
Buckeye Cardinal Unit 2 in Brilliant Ohio initiated this change in 2017.
Construction of Cardinal started in November 1963. The project was a joint
venture of Ohio Power (a forerunner of
AEP) and Buckeye Power. Units 1 and 2 began commercial generation in 1967
at a cost of $131 million. Unit 3 began generation in 1977 after six years of
construction at a cost of $220 million. In 2017, AEP and Buckeye Power reached
an agreement for Buckeye Power to operate all three units at Cardinal. To
further reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, AEP and
Buckeye Power announced in 2001 they would install selective catalytic reduction
(SCR) systems to complement their LO-NOx burners at Cardinal. The SCRs would
decrease NOx emissions at the plant from 30 percent to 90
percent. Between 2005 and 2010, flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) systems were
installed to all three units at Cardinal with Units 1 and 2 costing $300 million
to construct. The FGD equipment reduces sulfur dioxide (SO2)
emissions by 98 percent. A year after it was installed, inspectors found severe
corrosion in its tank vessel. AEP negotiated a settlement with Black & Veatch,
the contractor who installed the FGD equipment, to address the
corrosion. Instead of constructing a new chimney for Unit 3's FGD system, AEP
retrofitted a cooling tower to release waste heat into the atmosphere. AEP
announced in 2015 that its Cardinal unit will be converted into a natural gas
power plant by 2030 in order to comply with EPA standards.
This
590-MW coal unit spent $3 million to modify the system to allow DSI upstream of
the SCR. In this case, Buckeye will save more than $1.1 million every year.
About a third of that savings is from lowering the unit load by lowering the SCR
minimum operating temperature, about half of the savings is from reducing the
air heater outlet temperature and improving heat rate, and the rest is money
saved on maintenance.

Both sodium and calcium can achieve the reduction to 5 ppm SO3, but the hydrated lime has proved the most cost effective according to Don Wolf of Burns & McDonnell.

There
will be a continuing need for coal-fired power to supplement solar and wind.
Also, the low-cost coal plants will continue to operate for a number of years
due to economics. Finding ways to lower operating costs such as the hydrate
injection ahead of the SCR will extend the life of these plants and ensure that
they will not be replaced by gas turbine plants.
Greek Court cancels Permit for proposed Coal Plant
Greece’s Supreme Administrative Court, the Greek Council of State, has cancelled
the environmental permits for the Public Power Corporation’s (PPC) proposed 450
megawatt (MW) Meliti II unit and the existing 330 MW Meliti plant. The
environmental permits for the lignite-fired plants were challenged by
ClientEarth, WWF Greece and
Greenpeace Greece which argued
that the 2018 decision to issue a ten-year permit for the units without
undertaking an environment impact assessment was in breach of both Greek and
European Union law. The ruling has been welcomed by environmental groups, but
the written judgement is not expected to be issued for several weeks. The ruling
means that Meliti II will not proceed while the existing unit will require a
fresh permit to continue operating. In December, PPC announced that existing
lignite units would be phased out by 2023.
Enforcement action Launched Over One of Eskom’s Coal Plants
In
late December 2019 the South African
Dept. of Environmental Affairs’ Environmental Management Inspectorate, also
referred to as the Green Scorpions, issued a compliance notice to Eskom
requiring it to submit a maintenance plan by January 12 to “improve its
compliance with the minimum air quality standards” for its 4116 MW Kendal
coal plant. In July 2019 Eskom acknowledged that poor maintenance at its plants
during 2018 had resulted in increased pollution and that bag filters had failed
on four units at the plant. While the department said the timing of the
compliance plan rests with Eskom, the government-owned utility is under pressure
to close its two most polluting units, with a combined capacity of 1200 MW, and
detail what it will do about the other four polluting units. In June 2019 the
Centre for Environmental Rights, representing Ground Work and the Vukani Justice
Movement in Action, launched legal action against the South African Government
over pollution in Mpumalanga region from Eskom’s 12 coal plants, including
Kendal, and Sasol’s Secunda coal-to-liquids plant.
Indian Ministry of Power Proposes Yet Another Pollution Deadline Extension
India’s Ministry of Power
has proposed extending the December 2019 deadline for compliance with new
pollution standards for coal plants in the region around New Delhi. Only one of
11 utilities has met the December 2019 deadline for the installation of flue gas
desulfurization units. No enforcement action has been taken against the
non-compliant plants, despite extreme pollution levels in the region. The
Ministry of Power has proposed that the non-compliant plants should be required
to meet the new pollution standards between July 2020 and December 2021.
B&W
Subsidiary Awarded Retrofit Boiler Equipment Installation Contract for U.S.
Power Plant
Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., LLC (BWCC), a subsidiary of Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc. (B&W), has been awarded a contract for more than $5 million to
install retrofit boiler equipment at a U.S. coal-fired power plant.
BWCC’s project scope includes the removal and installation of various boiler
components, which will allow the plant to continue operating efficiently and
reliably for the customer.
BWCC
Vice President and General Manager Mike Hidas said, “BWCC operates regional
construction offices strategically located across North America that provide
valuable assistance for fast turnaround requests. This, combined with our deep
project and construction management experience, helps differentiate us from the
competition.”
Expert Microsystems receives Award from the US Department of Energy for Hybrid Analytics Solution to improve Coal-fueled Power Plant Operations
The
United States Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy (DOE) awarded
funding to Expert Microsystems, Inc. as part of its funding opportunity DE‐FOA‐0001989
entitled “Improving Efficiency, Reliability, and Flexibility of Existing
Coal-Based Power Plants.” The DOE seeks innovative solutions that integrate data
analytics and machine learning techniques with physics-based models to improve
coal-fueled power plant operations.
As the lead investigator, Expert Microsystem, Inc. will
develop, demonstrate, and commercialize a novel approach to improve coal-fired
power plants’ ability to follow loads and handle transient behavior by
integrating two proven real-time monitoring techniques. The hybrid analytics
approach provides a single solution that integrates an established, advanced
data-driven analytics solution that includes artificial intelligence, advanced
pattern recognition, and machine-learning techniques provided by Expert
Microsystems with a well-proven, first-principle thermal heat balance model
solution provided by MapEx Software Inc.
Randy Bickford President & CTO of Expert Microsystems notes
that, “The future role of coal plants will depend on the ability to cycle power
output and follow loads to meet marginal power demands, accommodate renewables
and support the grid. Essential to success in this new role is a plant’s ability
to maintain high reliability, efficiency and flexibility. However, these
changing operational demands put significant stresses on power plant components
that directly impact the ability to perform these new requirements. Our
innovative Hybrid Analytics solution enhances real-time fault detection,
provides automated diagnostics and remaining time to act forecasts, and provides
critical, enhanced and accurate real-time information to coal plant operators.
As a result, coal plants can improve efficiency, reliability, and flexibility
and can cost-effectively maintain their key role in the power delivery system.”
Also supporting Expert Microsystems in the execution of the
project is XMPLR Energy LLC.
FGD Program making progress in India
India is falling behind its target dates but is moving forward with as much wet
limestone FGD as was installed in the U.S. over several decades. It is also
installing more than any other country except China. The total has been expanded
this year to 167 GW and 441 units with the target date still 2022 for all units.

The number of FGD systems that have been commissioned is tiny, but the bid and
award process is comprehensive.

Bids have been awarded only for 8,000 MW of the 57,000 MW of units 500 MW or
larger.


FGD is being accompanied by ESP upgrades and some form of DeNOx as shown for the
Delhi area.


MIT compares Chinese
SO2 CEMS to Satellite Sata
The Chinese government accelerated implementation of tougher air pollution
standards for power plants, with limits to take effect in July 2014. One key
standard limited emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which contributes
to the formation of airborne particulate pollution and can cause serious lung
and heart problems. The limits were introduced nationwide but varied by
location. Restrictions were especially stringent in certain “key” regions,
defined as highly polluted and populous areas in Greater Beijing, the Pearl
River Delta, and the Yangtze River Delta.
Valerie J. Karplus, an assistant professor of global economics and management at
the MIT Sloan School of Management said “ there have been few attempts to look
systematically at plants’ compliance with environmental regulation. We wanted to
understand whether policy actually changes behavior.”
For China, focusing environmental policies on power plants makes sense. Fully 60
percent of the country’s primary energy use is coal, and about half of it is
used to generate electricity. With that use comes a range of pollutant
emissions.
To begin their study, the researchers examined changes in the CEMS data around
July 2014, when the new regulations went into effect. Their study sample
included 256 power plants in four provinces, among them 43 that they deemed
“large,” with a generating capacity greater than 1,000 megawatts (MW). They
examined the average monthly SO2 concentrations reported by each
plant starting in November 2013, eight months before the July 2014 policy
deadline.
Emissions levels from the 256 plants varied considerably. The researchers were
interested in relative changes within individual facilities before and after the
policy, so they determined changes relative to each plant’s average emissions —
a calculation known as demeaning. For each plant, they calculated the average
emissions level over the whole time period being considered. They then
calculated how much that plant’s reading for each month was above or below that
baseline. By taking the averages of those changes-from-baseline numbers at all
plants in each month, they could see how much emissions from the group of plants
changed over time.
In January 2014 plants were well above their baseline, and by July 2016 they
were well below it. So average plant-level SO2 concentrations were
declining slightly before the July 2014 compliance deadline, but they dropped
far more dramatically after it.
Based on the CEMS data from all the plants, the researchers calculated that
total SO2 emissions fell by 13.9 percent in response to the
imposition of the policy in 2014. “That’s a substantial reduction,” notes
Karplus. “But are those reported CEMS readings accurate?”
To find out, the researchers compared the measured CEMS concentrations with SO2
concentrations detected in the atmosphere by NASA’s Ozone Monitoring Instrument.
“We believed that the satellite data could provide a kind of independent check
on the policy response as captured by the CEMS measurements,” Karplus
says.
For the comparison, they limited the analysis to their 43 1,000-MW power plants
— large plants that should generate the strongest signal in the satellite
observations. Patterns in the two measures are similar, with substantial
declines in the months just before and after July 2014. That general agreement
suggests that the CEMS measurements can serve as a good proxy for atmospheric
concentrations of SO2.
To double-check that outcome, the researchers selected 35 relatively isolated
power plants whose capacity makes up at least half of the total capacity of all
plants within a 35-kilometer radius. Using that restricted sample, they again
compared the CEMS measurements and the satellite data. They found that the new
emissions standards reduced both SO2 measures. However, the SO2
concentrations in the CEMS data fell by 36.8 percent after the policy, while
concentrations in the satellite data fell by only 18.3 percent. So, the CEMS
measurements showed twice as great a reduction as the satellite data did.
Further restricting the sample to isolated power plants with capacity larger
than 1,000 MW produced similar results.
Key versus non-key regions
One possible explanation for the mismatch between the two datasets is that some
firms overstated the reductions in their CEMS measurements. The researchers
hypothesized that the difficulty of meeting targets would be higher in key
regions, which faced the biggest cuts. In non-key regions, the limit fell from
400 to 200 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). But in key regions,
the limit went from 400 to 50 mg/m3. Firms may have been unable to
make such a dramatic reduction in so short a time, so the incentive to
manipulate their CEMS readings may have increased. For example, they may have
put monitors on only a few of all their exhaust stacks or turned monitors off
during periods of high emissions.
At large, isolated plants in non-key regions, the CEMS measurements show a 29.3
percent reduction in SO2 and the satellite data a 22.7 percent
reduction. The ratio of the estimated post-policy declines is 77 percent — not
too far out of line.
But a comparable analysis of large, isolated plants in key regions produced very
different results. The CEMS measurements showed a 53.6 percent reduction in SO2,
while the satellite data showed no statistically significant change at all.
One possible explanation is that power plants actually did decrease their SO2
emissions after 2014, but at the same time nearby industrial facilities or other
sources increased theirs, with the net effect being that the satellite data
showed little or no change. However, the researchers examined emissions from
neighboring high-emitting facilities during the same time period and found no
contemporaneous jump in their SO2 emissions. With that possibility
dismissed, they concluded that manipulation of the CEMS data in regions facing
the toughest emissions standards was “plausible,” says Karplus.
Compliance with the new standards
Another interesting question was how often the reported CEMS emissions levels
were within the regulated limits. The researchers calculated the compliance rate
at individual plants — that is, the fraction of time their emissions were at or
below their limits — in non-key and key regions, based on their reported CEMS
measurements. In non-key regions, the compliance rate at all plants was about 90
percent in early 2014. It dropped a little in July 2014, when plants had to meet
their (somewhat) stricter limits, and then went back up to almost 100 percent.
In contrast, the compliance rate in key regions was almost 100 percent in early
2014 and then plummeted to about 50 percent at and after July 2014.
The researchers interpret that result as an indication of the toughness of
complying with the stringent new standards. “If you think about it from the
plant’s perspective, complying with tighter standards is a lot harder than
complying with more lenient standards, especially if plants have recently made
investments to comply with prior standards, but those changes are no longer
adequate,” she says. “So, in these key regions, many plants fell out of
compliance.”
She makes another interesting observation. Their analyses had already produced
evidence that firms in key areas may have falsified their reported CEMS
measurements. “So that means they could be both manipulating their data and
complying less,” she says.
Coal-fired Plants Around New Delhi Running Despite Missing Emissions Deadline
Coal-fired utilities around New Delhi were still operating despite threats from
the Indian authorities to close them down if they had not installed equipment to
cut emissions of sulfur oxides by the end of the year.
Three senior executives at companies operating power plants around New Delhi and
facing an end-2019 deadline said they had not received direction on whether they
could continue to run the plants having not installed the kit.
Only one out of the 11 utilities in the national capital region had installed
the equipment.
India had already extended its December 2017 deadline for its utilities to meet
the emissions standards—posing a further challenge to the authorities grappling
with the pollution that can cause lung disease and blights air quality.
Officials from India’s Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), who had
threatened a shut down for non-compliance, did not respond to repeated calls and
text messages seeking comment.
Reuters
reported last month that more than half of India’s coal-fired power plants and
94% of the coal-fired units ordered to retrofit equipment to curb air pollution
would likely miss the phased deadlines.
The air quality index for the Indian capital, the worst affected major city,
indicated “severe” conditions last week—like most days this winter—a potential
risk for even healthy people.
Real-time government data showed both power plants in the country’s largest
state of Uttar Pradesh which had a December 31 deadline were operating. In
Punjab, Vedanta-owned TSPL units were producing power, as were state-run plants
at Ropar and Bhatinda.
Mohammed Shayin, Managing Director at northern Haryana state-run power generator
HPGCL said all units other than ones under scheduled maintenance were
operational, adding that the utility was “pleading” with federal authorities to
extend the emissions deadline.
Private producers such as Vedanta and Larsen & Toubro Ltd argued for yet another
extension to the deadline.
L&T-owned Nabha Power Ltd said it was “constrained to shut down both its units
due to a delay in extension of timelines by the CPCB.”
Vedanta said it was “confident” that authorities “would take a considerate
stand.”
“We shall shut the plant in case we get the directions from the CPCB or the
environment ministry,” the company said.
Thermax Wins Rs. 431 Crore Order for Two Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Systems
Thermax Limited has concluded an order of Rs. 431 crore from a public-private
joint venture power company to set up two flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems
at their thermal power plant in the state of Jharkhand, India.
The customer will install two units of FGD systems of 525 MW capacity each at
their plant, to limit SOx emissions as per the revised regulations
from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
“The
Environment business has had a good run in terms of order intake, and I am happy
that we
have concluded the year on a high note with this inclusion. It also shows that
the implementation of industrial pollution norms has gained momentum in the
country, considering that we bagged two large FGD orders within a short span of
six months,” said M.S. Unnikrishnan, MD & CEO, Thermax Limited.
The scope of supply includes design, engineering, manufacturing, civil work,
construction and commissioning of the FGD systems. The commissioning of the
project is scheduled over 30 months.
Babcock & Wilcox Announces Renewal of Maintenance Contract for New Mexico Power
Plant
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. announced that its subsidiary, Babcock &
Wilcox Construction Co., LLC (BWCC), has received a contract renewal valued at
more than $4 million to provide maintenance services for Public Service Company
of New Mexico’s (PNM) San Juan Generating Station in 2020.
BWCC
will continue to provide a variety of services at the power plant next year,
including general plant maintenance, coal pulverizer equipment maintenance and
outage support, as it did in 2019.
“We
very much appreciate our long-term relationship with PNM and this opportunity to
continue to support them,” said Jimmy B. Morgan, Senior Vice President, The
Babcock & Wilcox Company. “We’re pleased that our customer has renewed our
contract and shown confidence in our services and ability to keep this critical
plant operating at peak performance.”
Omni
Warner, Director, San Juan Generating Station Plant Manager, said “We’re pleased
with the commitment to safety, high level of service and support BWCC has
provided us in 2019 and look forward to working closely with them in 2020. BWCC
provides a cost-effective approach as PNM continues to transition to a plant
closure in 2022.”
BWCC
Vice President and General Manager Mike Hidas also expressed his appreciation to
PNM for continuing its relationship with BWCC.
“B&W
supplied one of San Juan Generating Station’s current boilers, as well as other
key equipment,” Hidas said. “We have unmatched expertise and depth of experience
to service and maintain our own and competitors’ equipment anywhere in the
world. I thank PNM for the opportunity to continue providing our services for
its facilities.”
BWCC
provides outage services, installation, refurbishment, mechanical repair and
maintenance services for a variety of industries, equipment and plant
installations, regardless of the original manufacturer.
B&W Subsidiary to Supply Sootblowers for Power Plants in Asia
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.’s Scotland-based subsidiary, Diamond Power
Specialty Limited (DPSL), has been awarded two contracts to supply sootblowers
and furnace cleaning systems for two coal-fired power plants under construction
in Asia. The combined value of these contracts is more than $4 million.
DPSL will design and supply HydroJet® intelligent furnace cleaning
systems and sootblower systems for four boilers. The
equipment is scheduled for delivery to the facilities in 2021 and 2022.
“Diamond Power® boiler cleaning systems are known worldwide as the
most advanced and dependable technologies in the industry,” said B&W Chief
Executive Officer Kenny Young. “Whether for new-build coal plants like these
important projects in Asia, or as replacements and upgrades to existing plants,
our Diamond Power subsidiary can supply cost-effective and high-performing
boiler cleaning and ash-handling technologies.”
Diamond Power boiler cleaning systems are available in steam/air, high pressure
water, and dual-media air heater cleaning configurations. The company’s
specialized designs and configurations meet customer needs for precision,
reliability and efficiency.
MHI and Hitachi Dissolve MHPS Partnership
Hitachi and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd
have reached a settlement relating to a transfer of the boiler construction
projects in the Republic of South Africa conducted by Mitsubishi Hitachi Power
Systems, Ltd, the joint venture company that integrated the respective thermal
power generation system businesses of MHI and Hitachi, in conclusion of their
discussion.
Hitachi will transfer all of its shares of MHPS (share-holding ratio of 35
percent) to MHI. In addition, Hitachi will recognize settlement money of 200.0
billion yen as a debt for MHI, offset the amount by transferring its credit for
a subsidiary of MHPS to MHI at 70.0 billion yen and make a payment of 130.0
billion yen to MHI in March 2020.
Hitachi and MHI will promptly request JCAA (Japan Commercial Arbitration
Association) to stop the progress of the arbitration. MHI will withdraw the
request for arbitration in JCAA after the completion of the payment and the
transfer of shares mentioned above.
MHPS will become a 100 percent subsidiary of MHI and Hitachi will withdraw from
management of MHPS. Hitachi will continue to work with MHI on maintenance
services of existing thermal power generation plants. Hitachi will acquire
ABB’s world-class power grid
business in the first half of 2020, and by combining it with Hitachi’s digital
technology, Hitachi will provide high-value-added energy solutions globally. In
addition, Hitachi will contribute to stabilization of energy supply and
realization of decarbonized society by accelerating expansion of energy
solutions such as renewable energy, nuclear energy, and distributed power
supply.
Siemens to Equip Bajaj Energy
Plant in India with Digitalization Solutions
Siemens
will equip Lalitpur Power Generation
Company Limited (LPGCL), a Bajaj
Group company, with advanced digital solutions for its power plant
located in Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Siemens will provide a complete thermal twin for the LPGCL coal-fired power
plant, enabling improvements in the plant’s performance. Siemens experts, in
close collaboration with plant operations team, will provide remote performance
monitoring and diagnostics from the recently launched Siemens MindSphere
Application Center in Gurgaon. The thermal twin, powered by thermodynamic
analysis and machine learning, allows power plant operators to diagnose
performance gaps for every asset in the cycle in real time and provides
recommendations for improving efficiency. This co-creation approach will assist
the plant team in identifying and rectifying performance gaps in a timely
manner.
R. S. Sharma, Managing Director, Bajaj Power Ventures, said, “We are delighted
to partner with Siemens in our digitalization journey. The digital solutions are
aimed at improving power plant performance and optimizing operations. The
solutions, once executed, will result in sustainable and efficient power
generation.”
“With our advanced digital products and solutions, we are providing customers in
India and around the world with the tools to navigate changing market
requirements and meet their operational goals,” said Laura Anderson, head of
Siemens Gas & Power Services, Controls and Digitalization. “Close collaboration
from inside our MindSphere Application Centers enables us to work together with
our customers to fully realize the value behind their data.”
Over
90 percent of the coal-fired plants directed to comply with new pollution
standards by a December 31 deadline will not have installed the required flue
gas desulfurization (FGD) units. The plants have a combined capacity of 14,000
MW. The new standards were first announced in December 2015 with the initial
deadline for compliance in December 2017 extended to December 2019 following
lobbying from power utilities. The bulk of the plants set to breach the
standards are located in the states of Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. A
further 26,330 MW of coal units have been directed to meet the emission
standards by December 2020 and over 64,000 MW in each of 2021 and 2022. To date
contracts for FGD units have only been awarded for 35,200 MW of the total
capacity.
Indonesian Power Plant Will Operate with Advanced Air Pollution Controls meeting
Chinese Standards
Bengkulu will soon complete a long-awaited 2×100 MW coal-fired power plant. A
reliable electricity supply will accelerate the province’s economic development
and attract investors.
The
plant at Sepang Bay, which took three years to build, will go into full
operation in February of next year. The total 200 megawatts (MW) capacity will
not only power Sumatra’s western province but also nearby isolated regions.
With
approximately two million residents, Bengkulu province suffered an acute lack of
electricity. The new power plant will guarantee not only a reliable household
electricity supply but will also enable investors to start new businesses in the
area and accelerate economic growth.
The
US$360 million (Rp 5 trillion) power plant project is operated by
privately-owned power producer PT Tenaga Listrik Bengkulu (TLB) — a joint
venture between PowerChina Resources (PCR), which is a backbone subsidiary
controlled by PowerChina, and local heavy equipment distributor PT Intraco Penta
(INTA). PCR is the majority shareholder.
The
first unit of the plant has already been completed and began to generate
electricity in October. The second unit is expected to be fully functional by
the end of December. The final COD (commercial operation date) is February 2020.
At that time, TLB will supply electricity to state-owned utility firm PLN for
the next 25 years.
“We
hope all stakeholders will join forces to run and maintain these power plants
responsibly so that the people of Bengkulu can benefit from the project,” INTA
president director Petrus Halim said during a ceremony at the project site on
November 15. He added that the coal plant construction project is part of the
Indonesian government’s strategic plans to add another 35.000 MW of power
capacity. Bengkulu, a priority region for investment funds, has added Baai
Island as a special economic zone.
TLB
assures that the project meets official waste-management standards. The company
uses advanced technology to control the levels of emission from coal combustion
and to prevent toxic coal ash from contaminating the soil and water. The coal
for powering the plants is transported by sea instead of by land. This measure
is taken to minimize coal ash pollution during transport.
The
plant uses a cooling technology that circulates water to absorb heat. This
enables more efficient electricity production. The water is taken from the ocean
and flushed back into the sea after use because it is not polluted during the
process. Contaminated water will be treated and reused in the power plant site,
mostly to wash the coal and settle dust.
“The
contaminated water never goes out of the site. That means local residents will
still have safe groundwater,” said Zul Helmi, one of the power plant’s
engineers.
“The
first unit of the plant has begun operation at 80 percent capacity, and the
pollution from the chimney stack is hardly visible,” said Sun Shuhua, the
assistant of the general manager of PCR.
China, which uses coal power extensively, applies stricter air pollution
standards and more advanced technology in building power plants than Indonesia
does. The two new coal-fired power plants in Bengkulu are being built according
to China’s standard, Sun says.
PCR
has worked on projects in the Chinese "One Belt, One Road" initiative, which
develops infrastructure overseas. From the outset, the Chinese government has
fully supported the Bengkulu project.
EES
Acquires Novinda’s Amended-Silicate Technology for Mercury Control from Utility
& Industrial Power Plants
Environmental Energy Services, Inc. (EES), a privately held clean energy company
utilizing innovative chemistry for energy efficiency, air pollution control, and
water treatment for utility and industrial power plants announced that it has
acquired the exclusive intellectual property rights and all associated assets
for Amended-Silicate Technology from Novinda Holdings, Inc.
The
acquisition of the Amended-Silicate Technology expands EES’ current line of
KLeeNscrub® mercury mitigation products for wet flue gas
desulfurization (FGD) to include plants with dry FGD and circulating dry
scrubber technologies. Wet and Dry FGD technologies are used for SO2
emission control.
Making the announcement, Rick Nowak, President & CEO of EES said, “This
acquisition strengthens our existing business by increasing the applicability of
our current AQCS products to the power industry as well as expanding our
offerings to the waste-incineration, cement, and other industrial power
markets.”
Mark
Keffer, EVP added “EES is currently discussing projects with several energy
facilities interested in safer, environmentally friendly, corrosion-free
solutions to mercury control, acid gases, organics and other pollutants from the
combustion processes. The newly acquired Amended Silicates technology not only
delivers a high level of mercury emissions capture but also preserves the
beneficial use of fly ash, demonstrating exceptional SO3 tolerance
besides being less corrosive on the balance of plant equipment.”