FGD and DeNOx
NEWSLETTER       

April 2013
No. 420

For a printer friendly copy of this newsletter Click Here

NO_x

▪  Hitachi to Supply SCR for Xcel Hayden 1 and 2

▪  Wyoming’s OCA Supports SCR Retrofit at Jim Bridger

▪  Graycor Chosen as Contractor for Big Stone Emissions Control System

▪  San Juan Will Shutter Two Units, Retrofit SNCR on the Other Two

▪  1200-MW White Stallion Power Project in Texas Cancelled

▪  PMFG Awarded Three SCR Orders for Combined Cycle Power Plants

▪  Atlanta in Attainment for Ozone

▪  SCR Systems for Gas Turbines

▪  Fuel Tech Awarded HERT^TM and NO_xOUT Orders

▪  EPA Estimates $2240/ton NO_x Average Cost Effectiveness for SCR +LNB/SOFA at Navajo 1-3

▪  Power Plant Emissions of SO₂ and NO_x Continued to Decline in 2012

FGD

▪  Lhoist North America Sorbacal Hydration Facility at Ste. Genevieve Plant

▪  IDE’s MVC Desalination Units at AES Norgener (Chile) to Provide Water for FGD

▪  NID System at Indian River 4 Averages 0.1 lb/MMBtu SO₂

HAPS

▪  Otter Tail Power to Install ACI at Hoot Lake; Close Hoot Lake in 2020

▪  Hydrated Lime Injection at Bowen 1-4, Hammond and Wansley

▪  In Minnesota 90 Percent of Deposited Mercury Comes from Sources Outside the State

▪  Calgon Carbon Awarded Contract to Supply FLUEPAC

▪  Biogenic Reagents Produces Activated Carbon from Biomass

▪  Four Different Approaches to Removing Mercury

▪  Ammonia Slip Could Interfere with Monitoring HCl Emissions in a Unit with SCR and Wet FGD

▪  Cost-Effective Mercury Compliance with Hitachi TRAC^® Catalyst

▪  Enhanced Mercury Control by Managing SCR Systems for Mercury and NO_x

▪  SCR as Part of a MATS Compliance Strategy

Back to FGD and DeNOx Newsletter No. 420 Table of Contents