AIR POLLUTION MONITORING
& SAMPLING
NEWSLETTER
January 2010
No. 363
REGULATIONS
PA Mercury Reduction Rules Do Not withstand Test
Pennsylvania's highest court is upholding a decision to throw out a state rule that required coal-fired power plants to cut mercury emissions beyond federal standards. The rule required an 80 percent reduction by 2010 and a 90 percent reduction by 2015. The state Supreme Court ruled that Commonwealth Court Judge Dan Pellegrini was correct when he called the rule unlawful, invalid and unenforceable. The 2007 rule was challenged by PPL Corp., which owns two coal-fired power plants in Pennsylvania. The administration of Gov. Ed Rendell fought industry resistance for approval of the rule, which made Pennsylvania the first major coal-mining state to regulate mercury. However, a federal judge last year required mercury to be restored to a list of hazardous pollutants that Pennsylvania state law prohibits it from regulating.
Minnesota PCA Passes Haze Rules for Northern Parks
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA) has approved new regulations to curb haze over northern Minnesota despite complaints of federal land managers and environmental groups that the rules do not go far enough. The agency’s board voted 7-1 for the measures, aimed at combating haze over pristine areas like Voyageurs National Park, Isle Royale National Park and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness that are protected under federal Clean Air Act rules. The rules may eventually affect coal-burning power plants and taconite plants in Minnesota, as well as pulp and paper mills and other industries that may be required to install new haze-cutting pollution-control technology. PCA officials say the new rules are the first step toward cleaner skies over northern Minnesota, cutting 30,000 tons of the haze-causing emissions annually. The rules must be approved by the federal Environmental Protection Agency, which has ordered that air over national parks and wild lands should be haze-free by 2064.
Oklahoma Working on Regional Haze Rules
The Oklahoma Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is on the clock to come up with a proposal to reduce regional haze in federal wildlife areas. DEQ hosted a public hearing to allow comments on the plan, which two of the state’s largest utility companies insist could cost them a lot of money. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co. (OG&E) was the most vocal critic of the plan which officials said could force the utility company to spend more than $1 billion to install scrubbers to clean emissions at its coal-fired power plants. Instead, OG&E wants DEQ to amend the plan so the company can reduce emissions by switching from coal to natural gas to fuel the majority of its power plants.
INDUSTRY NEWS
Great Conference Slated for Shanghai May 5-7
Yokogawa to Supply Control System for CC Power Plant in Trinidad and Tobago
Yokogawa Electric Corp.’s subsidiary, Yokogawa Deutschland GmbH, has received an order from MAN Ferrostaal Industrial Projects GmbH to supply an automation and control system for the La Brea Combined Cycle (CC) Power Plant that is being built by MAN Ferrostaal Industrial Projects GmbH and Eisenbau Essen GmbH for Trinidad Generation Unlimited (TGU). This 720-MW power plant is being built near La Brea, a town on the south side of Trinidad Island. Scheduled to be completed in July 2011, the plant will meet the country’s rising demand for electricity.
This new power plant will have six gas turbines, six exhaust gas heat recovery steam generators, two steam turbines and auxiliary facilities. Yokogawa will provide a range of systems and products including a CENTUM® series integrated production control system to control all of these facilities, the ProSafe®-RS Safety Instrumented System for detecting abnormal conditions and safely initiating emergency shutdowns, the Exaquantum™ Plant Information Management System for recording and retrieving historical data, and the PRM™ integrated device management software package, as well as engineering and commissioning services.
Enviro Technology to Supply CEMs for 1875-MW Teeside
GDF Suez Energy UK has awarded Enviro Technology a contract to supply five continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMs) for its 1875-MW Teeside combined cycle power station. Enviro Technology has supplied five OPSIS systems to measure NOx, SO2, CO and O2. Associated reporting and data logging software and products have also been purchased.
DECISIVE CLASSIFICATION
Decisive Classification of Monitoring Technology is Needed
Will Americans be able to speak International English? A U.S. news columnist attended an international conference and was surprised to find that even though the conference was all in English, he and his fellow Americans could not understand the speakers. On the other hand, those people who spoke English as a second language seemed to have no problem. He conjectured that we may reach a point where Americans would be the only ones not understanding International English.
His analysis was focused on the pronunciation. But there is a far more serious threat. The definition of English technical words is now being transformed by the Asians. Here is a very obvious example. If you Google the words “Denitration SCR,” you see a display of links to articles in English by Chinese, Korean and Japanese authors. You also see U.S. patent references but all for applications by Asians.
We are helping the organizers of the “The 14th Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxide, Mercury and Fine Particle Pollution Control Technology Conference” to be held next May in Shanghai. Their website is much better than those for other Chinese conferences in terms of English usage. But they do use “denitration” instead of DeNOx or NOx reduction. The words “denitration” and denitrifcation have been used to describe elimination or reduction of nitrogen compounds. Since DeNOx eliminates oxygen, denitration is theoretically incorrect. But denitration seems to be the word of choice instead of DeNOx in Asia. Since definitions are ever changing and validated by usage it will not be long before denitration is equally acceptable.
If there is confusion at the highest fluency level, the problem is magnified tremendously as we move down the proficiency scale. Many English versions of conference programs and websites of Asian companies have words, phrases, and whole paragraphs that are either incomprehensible or confusing.
As part of its “Free News” site McIlvaine will be tackling this problem with the development of standard terminology in both English and in Chinese. The first step is to establish the standard classification terms in English. Much of this is already started in the five Air Quality Decision trees.
“Decisive Classification” is displayed at
http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/Universal_Decision_Tree/subscriber/Tree/Default.htm.
The classification system is a foster lineage formed with children from genetic lineages. Here are some foster lineages relevant to monitoring.
Each column is a word or phrase selected from a genetic lineage. CO2 is a child of Air Quality. Its siblings are DeNOx, FGD, Particulate, SO3 and Mercury. This is decisive classification because the division is based on the need for unique technology. Theoretically, FGD which involves SO2 might be the parent of SO3 but since scrubbers do not do a good job of removing SO33 it needs a separate column.
Using the same decisive logic HCl is not listed as a separate technology. The reason is that the FGD scrubber which captures the SO2 will also capture the HCL. The opposite is true in classifying air pollution technologies for waste incinerators. HCL would be the major class and SO2 would be incidental.
|
|||||||
|
CO2 Emission Reporting 二氧化碳排放报告
Electric Generating Units 发电机组
|
Federal Regulations 联邦法规 EPA Regulations 环保署法规
CO2 Emission Reporting 二氧化碳排放报告
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule 温室气体报告规则
These displays from the McIlvaine CO2 decisions system also illustrate the way Chinese equivalents are displayed.
Here are some examples from FGD Decisions system.
Electric Utilities - coal-fired boilers – air quality - FGD
► |
► |
|||
► |
► |
Products |
Electric Utilities - coal-fired boilers – air quality - FGD
Level 5 |
Level 6 |
Level 7 |
Level 8 |
Level 9 |
Electric Utilities - coal-fired boilers – air quality - FGD
Level 6 |
Level 7 |
Level 8 |
Level 9 |
Electric Utilities - coal-fired boilers – air quality - FGD
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
Level 6 |
Level 7 |
Level 8 |
||
Electric Utilities - coal-fired boilers – air quality - FGD
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
Level 6 |
Level 7 |
Level 8 |
The foster family sequence includes links to extensive data at each step along the way.
Here is an example from the NOx Decision Tree.
Electric Utilities—coal-fired boilers – air quality - DeNOx
► |
► |
► |
► |
Products |
NOx Continuing Decision Process For: Products
CEM Measurement of NH3 and Low Level NOx. Presented by Dan Kietzer, Sick Maihak. Hot Topic Hour October 22, 2009.
In-situ - System with Standard Components, presented by Dan Kietzer, Sick Maihak. Hot Topic Hour November 13, 2008.
Application SCR DeNOx Plant
The final examples are from the Particulate Decision Tree.
Electric Utilities—coal-fired boilers – air quality - Particulate
► |
► |
|||||
► |
Products |
Particulate Continuing Decision Process For: Products
Continuous PM CEMS Update, presented by Jeremy Whorton, ThermoFisher. Hot Topic Hour October 1, 2009.
Electric Utilities - coal-fired boilers – air quality - mercury
► |
► |
► |
► |
► |
► |
Products |
Mercury Continuing Decision Process For: Products
Managing your HG CEMS Maintenance and Certification. Presented by Terry Marsh, Shaw Environmental Hot Topic Hour March 6, 2008.
CMMS and Appendix K - July 12, 2007
Hg Monitoring Update - April 12, 2007
How Do the Suppliers Classify Their Products?
The above examples illustrate how the foster lineages are constructed from genetic lineages. Now let’s look at some of the genetic classification challenges.
Source: Gas Analyzers
Source: Particulate Analyzers
Source: Flow and Opacity Monitors
Ambient: Particulate Analyzers
Ambient: Gas Analyzers
Under source gas analyzers the company lists the following:
Thermo Scientific instruments for source emissions monitoring needs.
Gas filter correlation gas analyzer with enhanced communication capabilities
Optical filter gas analyzer with enhanced communication capabilities for source emissions monitoring
Direct Methane, Non-Methane Analyzer, Model 55i
Measurement of direct and non-direct methane utilizing FID technology
Continuous monitoring of up to ten gases or more with only one system
H2S - SO2 Analyzer, Model 450i
Pulsed fluorescence technology catalytically converts H2S to SO2
High Level CO Analyzer, Model 48i-HL
Using gas filter correlation technology, the Model 48i-HL measures the amount of carbon monoxide in the sample.
High Level NO-NO2-NOx Analyzer, Model 42i HL
Chemiluminescent gas analyzer with enhanced communication capabilities
Hydrogen Chloride Analyzer, Model 15i HCl
New! Utilizing gas filter correlation technology it measures ppm levels of HCl
Low Source NO-NO2-NOx Analyzer, Model 42i LS
Low source chemiluminescent gas analyzer w/enhanced communication capabilities
It's time for a new standard in mercury emissions monitoring
NDIR Multi-Gas Analyzer, Model 60i
Five gas analyzer utilizing non-dispersive infrared technology
NO-NO2-NOx Analyzer, Model 42i
Chemiluminescent gas analyzer with enhanced communication capabilities for ambient air and source emissions monitoring.
NOx Only Analyzer, Model 42i-D
Using chemiluminescence technology, the Model 42i-D measures the amount of nitrogen oxides in the air from sub-ppb levels up to 100ppm.
Pulsed fluorescence gas analyzer with enhanced communication capabilities for ambient air and source emissions monitoring.
Total Hydrocarbon Gas Analyzer, Model 51i
Monitor Labs uses the following classification:
Products
· Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
o In situ
· Flow Monitors
· Gas Monitors
· Opacity Monitors
· Particulate Monitors
· Software
Environnment S.A calls ambient monitoring “Air Quality” and splits this segment as follows:
Gas analyzers (SO2, H2S, TRS, NO, NO2, NOx, NH3, CO, CO2, O3, THC, BTX, VOC)
Open path multigas D.O.A.S. system
Particulates samplers and analyzers (TSP, PM10, PM2.5, PM1)
Data acquisition and data management softwares
Another category is Emission Monitoring split in the following manner:
Multi-gas stationary monitoring systems (extractive IR GFC, in situ IR GFC, FTIR, FID)
Dilution-based stationary monitoring systems
Portable or transportable monitoring systems
Long-term dioxin and furan sampling system
Data acquisition and data management softwares.
Wikipedia did not have much assistance in classification but they did have some information on measurement principles. Gas analyzers employ various techniques to accurately measure concentrations. Some commonly used techniques include: infrared and ultraviolet adsorption, chemiluminescence, fluorescence and beta ray absorption
The EPA technology transfer network has various papers which lead one to separate
predictive emissions monitors (PEMS) and CEMS. They single out hazardous air pollution control (HAP) CEMS, fabric filter bag leak detectors, ammonia CEMS, mercury, and PM (particulate).
Ron Jernigan has provided regular papers analyzing the experience with CEMs by the utility industry. The reporting segmentation is as follows:
Acquisition Method
1. Dilution extractive
2. Extractive
3. In situ
Principles of operation
1. SO2 Monitors
A. Fluorescence
B. UV Spectrographic
2. NOx monitors
A. Chemiluminescence
B. UV spectrophotometric
3. CO2
A. IR (Infra Red)
4. O2
A. Paramagnetic
B. Electrocatalytic
A Number of Genetic Lineages Can Be Created from the Above Data
Using decisive classification rather than theoretical the practice is not to make a big distinction between single gas and multi gas analyzers. Therefore the genetic lineage by gas type could be:
Source Gas Analyzers by Pollutant for Power Plants
Genetic Base Class |
Aliases |
Cousins |
CO |
|
|
CO2 |
|
|
Direct Methane |
|
|
H2S |
|
|
HCl |
|
|
Multi gas |
|
FTIR multi gas, NDIR multi gas |
NH3 |
|
|
NOx |
|
NO,NO2 |
SO2 |
|
|
*THC |
Total hydrocarbon |
|
*TRS |
|
|
*For non-utility applications these two pollutants plus O3, BTX, VOC and other pollutants may be continuously analyzed.
There is a genetic lineage for Monitoring Acquisition Method, which is shown in Figure 1.
There is also a genetic lineage by Principle of Operation, which is shown in Figure 2.
Here is one final example to integrate the foster and genetic family. The following shows the most popular SO2 CEM for power plants.
Electric Utilities -coal-fired boilers – air quality - FGD
► |
► |
► |
SO2 - Dilution Extractive |
--fluorescence -- sources
In this case there is a lack of clarity relative to the principle of operation. There needs to be some input and consensus from the industry as to how to clearly classify the principles based on actual use not theory. Once there is consensus in English it will be a much simpler task to prepare the Chinese equivalent.
We invite the subscribers to this newsletter to weigh in on any aspect of this endeavor.
Back to Monitoring Newsletter No. 363 Table of Contents