UTILITY E-ALERT

 

#859 – February 1, 2008

 

Table of Contents

 

EUEC INSIGHTS

 

 

COAL – U.S.

 

 

COAL – WORLD

 

 

GAS/OIL – U.S.

 

 

GAS/OIL – WORLD

 

GASIFICATION

 

 

NUCLEAR

 

 

BUSINESS

 

 

HOT TOPIC HOUR

 

 

 ACCESSING ALL THE PROJECTS AND INFORMATION ONLINE

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EUEC INSIGHTS

 

Three hundred and fifty papers were delivered at the EUEC Conference in Tucson this week. There were also lots of good exhibits which are covered with audio interviews and pictures.With over 1400 attendees and with even more expected next year, the conference will move to the Phoenix Convention Center.

 

Here are some of the insights from the presentations.

 

  1. Permitting is a critical step in the implementation of a new generation project. Most utilities understand the impacts that emissions limits for sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate have on the selection of control technologies and operating costs. However, utilities often do not realize that the secondary provisions of the permits must also receive careful scrutiny. Secondary requirements, such as limits on trace emissions (SO3, VOCs, ammonia, etc.) stipulations on test methods and stipulations on averaging periods, can make it difficult for utilities to comply with their permits and negotiate contracts with equipment vendors. As a result, the utility can be left with unprotected risks for Air Quality Control System (AQCS) performance.

 

(Diane Fisher, Black & Veatch)

 

  1. In this, the dawn of CO2 regulation, increasing efficiency in existing electric generating units seems to be low hanging fruit. But you’ll only hold that belief until you learn the realities of our Clean Air Act. Current air quality regulations actually serve as a disincentive to increasing operating efficiency through several mechanisms, including:

 

 

(Robynn Adracsek, Burns & McDonnell)

 

  1. Dayton Power & Light Company (DP&L) successfully completed the installation of FGD equipment at the 615 MW Killen Station located in Wrightsville, Ohio in June, 2007. The Chiyoda JBR system removes almost all of the sulfur dioxide from the emissions at Killen Station. In addition, the scrubber, in conjunction with the existing electrostatic precipitator, will capture significant mercury and fine particulate emissions. DP&L is in the process of installing the same FGD technology at the 2,388 MW Stuart Station in Aberdeen, Ohio. DP&L owns 2,800 MW of coal-fired generating capacity and by mid-year 2009, approximately 80 percent will be “scrubbed.” The cost of FGD and SCR environmental technology at Stuart and Killen stations totals more than $1 billion.

 

(Greg Odegard, Dayton Power & Light, co-author – Kevin Crawford)

 

  1. New spray technology is allowing for smaller droplet sizes and improved liquid-to-gas contact that is improving scrubber performance. In many instances, efficiency can be gained by replacing old nozzles with technologically better nozzles, which maximize droplet surface area and enhance SO2 removal. Efficiency in the scrubber is dependent wholly on useable surface area of the limestone slurry. The reaction between the limestone and SO2 is liquid-phase controlled, meaning that while the gaseous SO2 readily diffuses throughout a well-designed scrubber, the reaction can only penetrate a small thickness of the surface area of the slurry droplets. Minimizing the droplet size partially remedies this issue by increasing the area-to-volume ratio of the individual droplet. Droplet-droplet interaction can cause shear forces to break up the droplets, causing surface area regeneration. This allows the remainder of the limestone previously trapped within a droplet to react further with the SO2 in the gas. Properly designed header systems and well-engineered nozzles can increase these shear forces, increasing overall scrubber efficiency. Some known design techniques in use today include offset headers and differing spray angles to maximize slurry coverage to minimize gas sneakage and to minimize loss of slurry at the wall.

 

(Robbert van Durme, Lechler Inc.)

 

  1. Furnace sorbent injection is cost effective technology to reduce SO2 emissions for smaller (i.e. <300 MW) boilers. While requiring more sorbent than wet scrubber or spray drier technologies, furnace sorbent injection has relatively low capital cost and typically provides 50 percent to 60 percent SO2 control. Along with these conventional sorbents, promoted sorbents can provide higher levels of SO2 reduction. GE Environmental Services has been developing advanced sorbents for SO2 control that simultaneously reduce mercury emissions. Testing in a 1 MBtu/hr coal combustor was conducted to characterize SO2 and mercury removal efficiencies of the sorbent, temperature at which sorbents were injected and stoichiometric ratio of sorbent to sulfur. Testing has demonstrated that promoted sorbents can achieve up to 80 percent SO2 reduction at Ca:S ratio of 2 and simultaneously reduce mercury emissions by ~25 percent. Promoted sorbents also have ~30 percent better utilization than lime and sodium carbonate. Future development efforts will focus on improving sorbent utilization while increasing reactivity towards mercury.

 

(Vitali Lissianski, GE Energy, co-author – Pete Maly)

 

  1. Thomas Siedhoff, Reagent Technology Services, discussed an alternative innovative approach that is now being employed to produce and supply pulverized limestone reagent directly to the power plant thereby eliminating the entire reagent preparation island and resulting in some obvious and other more subtle benefits for power plants. This approach is based on the concept of regional reagent grinding centers employing dry roller mills to product a prepared reagent to exacting specifications. Dry roller mills are less capital intensive and energy intensive than wet ball mills. Roller mills can be installed at the limestone quarry or at the utility or at a centralized location to optimize the logistics costs. Also, one regional grinding center can supply multiple power plants, eliminating unnecessary redundancy. In addition to the direct capital and operating cost benefits, power plants will decrease their parasitic power load allowing for increased electricity sales, decrease the process footprint at their plant site and reduce their working capital. The end result in nearly all circumstances is a lower net evaluated cost to supply reagent and a much simplified FGD system operation.

 

(Thomas Siedhoff, Reagent Technology Services)

 

  1. Industry knowledge suggests that plants with electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) will be forced to either replace or add pulse jet fabric filters (PJFFs) in order to achieve the aggressive mercury (Hg) emissions reductions required by the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) and various state mandates. Unfortunately, the addition of a PJFF to an existing plant is seldom a simple retrofit; often requiring additional ID fans, duct and boiler reinforcement, additional auxiliary electric equipment and an equipment footprint that is often not available. However, there are less capital intensive alternatives capable of particulate and Hg reductions comparable to PJFF systems with activated carbon injection systems at existing plants nationwide. Some of these alternatives involve the existing ESPs instead of installing new PJFFs.

 

(Jeff Arroyo, Sega, Inc., co-author – Ryan Zupon)

 

  1. Flyash from the electric power industry has been utilized for years by the cement industry as either an alternate source of alumina and iron in the raw material or as a pozzolonic agent in the cement product. There are both economic and environmental benefits from the beneficial reuse of flyash in cement production which include the reduction of virgin raw materials, energy requirements and CO2 emissions per ton of cement produced. However, the emphasis on mercury control at power plants and the increased scrutiny of the cement industry emissions may negatively impact the continued use of flyash by the cement industry. The power industry has investigated the use of activated carbon as a mechanism to control mercury emissions while also developing activated carbon which will not affect the character of the cement product. The activated carbon can create air entrainment and color issues in concrete products using cement containing flyash with activated carbon. However, when flyash from power plants using activated carbon to control mercury emissions is used as a substitute raw material by a cement plant, the mercury problem may be transferred from one industry to another.

 

(Christa Russell, Schreiber, Yonley & Associates, co-author – Robert J. Schreiber, Jr.)

 

 

  1. Ceramatec, Inc. has developed a low cost treatment process where the carbon in the high carbon flyash is deactivated (as reflected in the foam index tests). This deactivation allows the high carbon flyash to remain suitable for use in concrete applications. Ceramatec is actively looking to partner with interested coal-fired power plants and cement manufacturers to initiate pilot projects that utilize its proprietary technology.

 

(Tom Campbell, ADA-ES, Inc.)

 

  1. Dr. David Mazyck and colleagues at the University of Florida (UF) developed an innovative silica-titania composite (STC) material and process for mercury capture. Four years of research targeted at mercury capture employing the STC technology resulted in elemental mercury (Hg0) capture exceeding 99.9 percent in simulated flue gas. This patent-pending technology has demonstrated mercury capture orders of magnitude greater (300 mg/g) than achievable by activated carbon and can be used to oxidize and adsorb all species of mercury. The STC technology has been proven at the bench scale and the pilot scale for recovery of mercury from air streams from chlor-alkali facilities. The first commercial units for this application have been installed and in operation for over a year.

     

(Jennifer Stokke, Mazyck Technology Solutions, LLC,

co-authors – Anna I. Casasús and David W. Mazyck)

 

  1. Sol-gel Solutions, LLC (Sol-gel) has developed a technology capable of achieving Hg concentrations as low as 11 ppt in industrial wastewaters. This technology has been tested at the bench-scale using a variety of Hg-contaminated waters from the chlor-alkali industry, including secondary treatment water, storm water and groundwater. In addition, a pilot-scale study was conducted at a chlor-alkali facility and resulted in about 95 percent Hg removal. This approach would offer en economical solution that would result in low operation and maintenance costs, would require minimal servicing and could be easily incorporated into an existing treatment train. The technology is well suited for Hg removal from waters with a broad range of chemical compositions, including water from wet scrubbers.

 

(Anna Casasús, Sol-gel Solutions, LLC, co-author – David W. Mazyck)

 

 

  1. Corning, Inc. has developed a novel mercury emission control concept that uses a honeycomb-type mercury absorber after the particulate matter device. This concept has been confirmed to be a promising mercury emission control technology for utility boilers burning both bituminous coals and PRB coal. The absorber achieved more than 90 percent mercury removal during a long term test without replacing the honeycomb adsorbent in a lab-scale testing facility. This technology also does not impact the potential use of valuable flyash. Several field tests were completed in flue gas slipstreams at facilities burning bituminous coal and PRB coal where 90 percent mercury removal efficiency was also achieved. The success of Corning’s technology demonstrations were accomplished by partnering with ICSET of WKU.

 

 (Yan Cao, ICSET of WKU & Corning, Inc.)

 

 

35 Audio Interviews with Exhibitors, Speakers and other Experts

 

Pleated bags and more efficient pulsing systems were two technologies described by Darlene Lowman, Tom Anderson and Keith Ogilvie. Midwesco provides service and engineering, not just bags and parts.

 

At the Mississippi Lime stand Eric Van Rens cited the advantages of hydrated lime for both SO2 and SO3 removal. With multiple facilities and rail transport, hydrated lime can be supplied throughout the U.S.

 

Tom Siedhoff, Reagent Technology Services, points out that dry grinding consumes less energy. Regional grinding is an economical opportunity for wet limestone FGD operators.

 

Sunil Dave of Burns & ROE updated us on the latest pricing of FGD and SCR systems. Wet FGD costs in excess of $300/kW and SCR costs in excess of $150/kW are what utilities are paying for installed systems.

 

Jean Bustard of ADA-ES says that there are lots of variables which result in ACI costs ranging from less than 0.5 mills/kWh to 3 mills/kWh.

 

Rich Miller of ADA-ES says that a hedge against a surge in carbon prices is TOXECON.

 

Barron is far more than a fan rebuilder. According to Marve Breeding and Allen Ray, they provide new fans, dampers and make their own expansion joints.

 

Jim Dickerman of Chemical Lime discussed SO3 removal with lime and the advantages of wet lime FGD systems in minimizing capital cost.

 

Discussions with Bruce Mallet, David Evans, Michael Long, and Rocky Moser of Shaw

covered the very successful program to supply Mercury CEMS systems and services and also the support for greenhouse gas emission quantification and minimization.

 

We will cover more of the interviews in the next Alert and will be posting the interviews and pictures in the next two weeks.

 

COAL – U.S.

 

Dave Johnston, Mercer, Sutton, Sevier will use Dry Scrubbing

 

PacifiCorp 230 and 360 MW Dave Johnston 3 and 4 will have B&W spray driers and baghouses. Kiewit and TIC will provide the engineering and construction. Other projects where dry scrubbing is slated are TVA John Sevier, Progress Energy Sutton and PSEG Mercer. First Light Mount Tom will use a Babcock Power Turbosorp FGD with hydrated lime. AES Greenidge has had some hydration problems. So buying lime already hydrated is attractive.

 

Kiewit and TIC Supply Stacks on their Projects

 

While they are not bidding stacks for other projects, Kiewit and TIC are designing and supplying stacks for their turnkey projects. Examples are City Water & Light (Springfield, IL) Lakeside and San Antonio City Public Services Spruce 2.

 

Duke Receives Air Permit for Edwardsport IGCC Power Plant

 

Duke Energy Corp. has received an air permit from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management for its planned $2 billion coal gasification plant in the southwestern Indiana town of Edwardsport. "The decision on the air permit is the last approval we needed to start construction," Jim Stanley, president of Duke Energy's Indiana operations, said in a news release. Duke said it anticipates that construction will be complete by 2012.

 

DOE Pulls Support for FutureGen

 

The U.S. Department of Energy has pulled its support of the 275 MW FutureGen power plant in Mattoon, Illinois. “This restructuring…is an all-around better deal for Americans,” said Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman in making the announcement to scuttle the FutureGen program. Bodman said the Energy Department would solicit industry applications for participation in the new carbon capture projects. The idea is for the government to pay for building the carbon capture and storage facilities and industry to build the modern coal-burning power plant. Each project would be designed to capture one million metric tons of CO2.

 

The FutureGen Alliance issued a statement saying it “remains committed to keeping FutureGen on track” but it was unclear how that would be possible without the federal funding. Michael Mudd, the alliance’s chief executive officer, called the project “America’s best hope for near-zero emission coal technology” as quickly as possible. “It will take four to five years for DOE to evaluate new proposals, place contracts, and conduct environmental reviews for new projects,” said Mudd in a statement on the Alliance’s Website.

 

“There was a consensus view that the price of this project will only increase,” said Deputy Energy Secretary Clay Sell of the FutureGen program. Sell said he and Bodman learned only last March that FutureGen’s cost had escalated from an original $950 million to $1.8 billion. “I knew (then) that we were in to something that would not end well,” Sell told reporters in a conference call Wednesday.

 

Virginia Air Pollution Control Board Seeks More Information on Wise County

 

Virginia officials are exploring whether Dominion Virginia Power could use different technology or another type of coal at a plant proposed in southwest Virginia that would lower air pollution. The Virginia Air Pollution Control Board voted to seek more information from the state Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the utility and the public about other options for the 585 MW CFB power plant proposed for Wise County. A DEQ spokesman says the board was not satisfied with Dominion's assertion that its plan to burn waste coal and wood products was the best option.

 

850 MW Washington County would use SCR, Wet FGD, Baghouse, Sorbent Injection

 

We reported in the January 18 Alert (#857) that a group of 10 electric power cooperatives filed a construction permit with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to build an 850 MW coal-fired power plant near Sanderville, Georgia. We have now learned that the proposed Washington County Power Station would burn Illinois Basin and PRB coal. The plant is expected to install SCR, wet scrubber, sorbent injection, and fabric filters and has an anticipated start-up date of 2013.

 

Allen-Sherman-Hoff has Contract with Basin Electric Dry Fork for MAC System Bottom-Ash Technology

 

Basin Electric Power Cooperative has chosen Allen-Sherman-Hoff (A-S-H), a Diamond Power International, Inc. company, to supply a completely dry, bottom-ash handling system for 385 MW Dry Fork. The MAC System (Magaldi Ash Cooler) is a unique bottom-ash extraction technology that, unlike conventional methods, requires no water to cool or convey the ash. This makes the system an ideal choice for plants like Dry Fork, located in water constrained areas.

 

“We are pleased to be working with Basin Electric, Sargent & Lundy and Babcock & Wilcox for this important project,” said Stephen Scott, General Manager of A-S-H Engineered Systems. “With 88 systems installed worldwide and an additional seven on order, the MAC System has become the technology of choice for a significant portion of the latest generation of new coal-based power stations and an increasing number of retrofits. Users report water savings, improved reliability, reduced operational and maintenance cost as well as the ability to recycle the dry, low-carbon ash byproduct into higher value products such as Portland cement substitute.”

 

Clean Air Group to Sue Xcel for Opacity Violations at Cherokee

 

A clean-air advocacy group alleges that Xcel Energy’s Cherokee coal-fired power plant in north Denver, Colorado has violated pollution standards thousands of times over the past five years. Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action on Monday notified Xcel that it plans to sue the company for 13,642 alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act, which the group said it gleaned from the utility’s filings with the state. Xcel spokeswoman Ethnie Groves said the group’s accusations are without merit. “Xcel has acted in full compliance with the law,” Groves said. “We are taking measures to decrease emissions across the board.” The clean-air group alleges Cherokee’s opacity level exceeded allowable limits more than 500 times over the past five years. The group also claims the plant’s opacity monitors exceeded downtime limits on thousands of occasions.

 

TIC to Upgrade Emissions Controls at Gallagher 1-4

 

TIC is the general contractor to upgrade Cinergy’s air pollution control equipment on the Gallagher 1-4 power plant as part of a system-wide air quality control program.

 

North Carolina Lawsuit against TVA Can Continue

 

North Carolina can proceed with a lawsuit that accuses the Tennessee Valley Authority of causing a "public nuisance" with pollution from its coal-fired plants, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, VA., said the lawsuit filed by state Attorney General Roy Cooper in January 2006 can continue.

 

Sierra Club Appeal of Taylorville Air Permit Denied

 

EPA denied the Sierra Club’s appeal of the air permit granted to the Taylorville Energy Center. The project is now poised to move forward once enabling legislation is passed by the Illinois General Assembly. On June 5, 2007, following a two year application process, the Illinois EPA granted the first U.S. air quality permit for a commercially-sized IGCC power generating facility to the Taylorville Energy Center (TEC), a $2 billion, 630 MW project being developed by Christian County Generation LLC (CCG). Independent power producer Tenaska is Christian County Generation's managing partner.

 

Kansas Legislature tries to Resurrect Sunflower Electric Holcomb

 

Supporters of the 2 x 700 MW Sunflower Electric Holcomb power project in western Kansas introduced legislation Wednesday that would require the state to approve construction of the plant while imposing limits on carbon dioxide emissions. Backers of the bill described it as a compromise between those who want the $3.6 billion plants and environmentalists who oppose the project because it would emit annually 11 million tons of carbon dioxide and other pollutants. House Bill 2711 and Senate Bill 515 would essentially allow Sunflower to reapply for its permits and would limit Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Rod Bremby’s authority by not allowing him to consider carbon dioxide emissions. It also would set into place allowable CO2 emissions for new plant which would be lowered by 20 percent after one year of operation and 30 percent after 10 years.

 

Zoning Changes Approved for 250 MW Highwood in Montana

 

Cascade County commissioners on Thursday voted 2-1 to approve a heavy industrial zoning designation necessary for construction of the Southern Montana Electric Generation & Transmission 250 MW Highwood coal-fired power plant proposed east of Great Falls, Montana.

 

COAL – WORLD

 

EnBW/Dow to Build 800 MW Coal-fired Power Plant at Stade Chemical Plant in Germany

EnBW Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg AG and the German unit of Dow Chemical Co. Tuesday said they have agreed to develop jointly an energy plan for the chemical company's Stade site in northern Germany. Under the agreement, the companies will jointly construct coal-fired and combined cycle gas turbine power generation capacity of more than 1,000 MW. The amount of investment in the project isn't yet clear, said EnBW spokesman Dirk Ommeln. But he added that the planned coal-fired power plant will be an 800 MW class facility. A similar power plant is currently being planned in Karlsruhe, southern Germany, for which the company will invest around €1 billion, Ommeln said.

Reliance Power receives SPV for 4,000 MW Krishnapatnam

 

Power Finance Corporation (PFC) on Tuesday handed over the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) — Coastal Andhra Power Limited — set to execute the much delayed 4,000 MW Krishnapatnam Ultra Mega Power Project (UMPP) in Andhra Pradesh to Anil Ambani-owned Reliance Power Limited (RPL). Reliance Power had emerged as the lowest bidder for the project by bidding to supply power at an average of Rs. 2.33 per unit. RPL’s bid was much lower than the other two bids received from Larsen & Toubro (Rs. 2.68 per unit) and Sterlite (Rs. 4.18 per unit). This is the second UMPP for Reliance Power after the award of 4,000 MW Sasan UMPP in Madhya Pradesh. While Krishnapatnam will be run on imported coal, Sasan is a pithead coal project. RPL is hopeful of completing the project in 39 months.

 

China will close 13,000 MW of Small Coal-fired Power Plants in 2008

 

China will close more small coal-fired power stations in 2008 to save energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The goal is to eliminate 13,000 MW or about 30 percent more than the target of 10,000 MW set last year, according to the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). Last year, China shut 553 small thermal power generators with a total capacity of 14,380 MW, 44 percent above the target. The State Council has set a target of closing 50,000 MW of thermal power capacity from 2006 to 2010.

 

600 MW Masinloc Project in the Philippines receives Loan

 

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has earmarked around $700 million for lending to the Philippines this year, with around $250 million to be set aside for the winning bidder for the concession of the power grid operator National Transmission Corp., a bank official said. For the energy sector, the ADB will continue to support the privatization of National Power Corp.’s plants. The Monetary Board earlier approved a $450-million loan that Masinloc Power Partners Co. Ltd. -- the winning bidder for the 600-MW coal-fired plant in Masinloc, Zambales -- planned to take out to expand the plant.

 

Delay in 2100 MW Mmamabula Coal Mine and Power Project in Botswana

 

South African power utility Eskom has strongly denied suggestions circulating in the industry that it was culpable in delaying the development of the Mmamabula coal-mine and energy project proposed for development in neighboring Botswana, which is also poised to become arguably the largest independent power producer (IPP) supplying into the power-hungry South African grid. The project, which could involve a 7.5 to 9-million-ton-a-year coal mine, as well as the 2,100 to 2,460 MW power plant, was being pursued by CIC Energy. Eskom Enterprises MD Brian Dames said he had been given a board mandate to support the IPP project, as well as conclude a mutually beneficial power purchase agreement with CIC. "We are ready to sign the contract with Mmamabula, but they are not ready," Dames asserted.

 

Israel could build 1,260 MW Addition at Rutenberg

 

A national infrastructure plan for the construction of two coal-powered electricity generating units (630 MW each) at the Rutenberg power plant in Ashkelon is currently being promoted in Israel. The two new units will be added to the four already existing coal-powered units at the site. An environmental impact assessment has been prepared for the plan, which is currently being reviewed by the environmental advisor of the National Infrastructure Committee. The Ministry of Environmental Protection said that a plan for a coal-fired power plant at the proposed site may be approved after the following conditions are implemented:

  1. The plan to be submitted will relate to a coal-fired power plant with a technology equivalent to the environmental performance of a power plant operating on natural gas such as IGCC technology.
     
  2. The government will take clear and effective steps to reach the target of 20 percent savings in electricity consumption by promoting an aggressive policy for modifying electricity consumption patterns and spearheading energy efficiency.
     
  3. Energy generation from raw materials and other innovative technologies with reduced adverse impact on the environment (e.g., solar plants, pumped storage, etc.) should be reviewed and promoted.
     
  4. A plan for the construction of an LNG terminal should be submitted to the National Planning and Building Board for approval.
     
  5. Implementation in practice of at least 1,200 MW of the power plants currently in the planning inventory (in addition to plants included in the development plans of the Ministry of National Infrastructure) and realization of the energy potential of existing power plants by repowering.

Oman could look at Coal for Fuel for IWPP at Barka or Sohar

 

Oman Power & Water Procurement Company (OPWP) has told IWPP project consultants they could be asked to carry out a separate feasibility study into the use of coal feedstock. The move is driven by fears over gas shortages. OPWP says a 48 percent increase in gas supplies to 7.2 billion cubic meters a year will be needed by 2013 to fuel power and desalination plants. If the coal option proves feasible, it will be the first time a Gulf state has developed a coal-fired power plant. The IWPP will be located at Barka or Sohar. It will have capacity of 700 MW of power and 26 million gallons a day of desalinated water. Although the UK's Berwin Leighton Paisner and Switzerland's Electrowatt Engineering Services have been selected as the legal and technical advisers on the IWPP, neither firm has signed a contract. The financial advisory contract is also still pending. The IWPP is due to be fully operational by 2011, and a coal-fired power plant could take 12 months longer to bring online than a gas-fired power plant, because of the sultanate's lack of experience with coal and the need to source supplies of the fuel from India.

 

Asia Energy awaiting Decision on 1,000 MW Power Plant and Coal Mine in Bangladesh

 

The United Kingdom-based Asia Energy has sought an early government decision on whether Bangladesh will accept its $2.5 billion investment proposals in the energy sectors there, a company executive said on Saturday. The company had submitted an investment proposal of $2.5 billion in October 2005 to develop the Phulbari mine in Banbladesh’s northern Dinajpur district. It would do so through the open pit system and set up a 1,000 MW mine mouth power plant. "Phulbari coal will power the northwest and rest of Bangladesh," Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Asia Energy Corporation (Pty) Bangladesh Ltd Gary Lye was quoted as saying by the Financial Express (FE), the country's lone financial daily. "As mine development and power plant construction takes time, the decisions should be taken without delay." However, the government is yet to approve Asia Energy's development scheme as it was waiting for adoption of a national coal policy. A draft coal policy has been framed and it is expected to be approved by the government within a few months.

Yeniköy Yatağan Electric Production could use Waste Steam to Heat Cities of Yatagan and Mugla, Turkey

 

A new project is underway to use the steam that goes to waste from the Yatağan thermal power plant for heating Yatağan and Muğla, Turkey. This project, which will be completed in two-and-half years, aims to help heat 16,500 houses and will become a model for similar plans in the rest of Turkey. The cost of heating using this steam will be six times cheaper than using coal, thus contributing to the fight against air pollution in Yatağan. The chimney gas handling facilities of the Yatağan thermal power plant started operating in 2007 and since then SO2 has been drastically reduced, said Nuri Şerifoğlu, General Manager of Yeniköy Yatağan Electric Production A.Ş. (YEAŞ).

 

Last fall, a project to build a second power plant in Yatağan came on the agenda. Yatağan residents, who have been suffering the adverse effects of air pollution and are in a struggle to make the Yatağan thermal power plant stop operating, staged a protest against the plan in late October. Five years ago studies were carried out on the Yatağan power plant, and a court decision required Yatağan’s closure. However, it keeps operating under a decision of the council of ministers who cited the employment provided by the plant.

 

PLN Signs Loans for 600 MW Suralaya and 600 MW Paiton Projects

 

Indonesia state electricity firm PT PLN signed Wednesday a loan agreement worth US$615 million with China Exim Bank to finance the construction of two power plants in Java. The bank will provide loans of $330.8 million for the 600 MW Suralaya coal-fired power plant in Banten and $284 million for the 600 MW Paiton coal-fired power plant in East Java, Indonesia.

 

Clyde Pumps is supplying Additional Boiler Feed Pumps for 250 MW Paras and 250 MW Parli Extensions in India

 

Clyde Pumps, incorporating Weir Pumps Glasgow, has received an award for an additional four advanced class boiler feed pumps from BHEL (Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.) for their extensions at the Paras and Parli power stations in India.

 

Asahi, Ireland Prefers Gas-Fired Power Project, not Coal, Peat, Timber-fired

 

The Asahi Development Committee has called on County Manager Des Mahon to facilitate the bringing of gas to Asahi, Ireland and to engage with RWE and Rockland Capital to make this happen. This comes in a week when controversy arose over a survey, which found that 82 percent of respondents were against the development proposed by Mayo Power Ltd, which would see the development of a peat, timber, and coal-fired power station. Michael O’Donnell, Chairman of the Asahi Development Committee, has asked that the record be set straight. “We are pro-development and pro-jobs,” he said. “It is our opinion that the Asahi site is ideally suited for a power generating plant with its access to two 110KV lines. We believe that if this happens there will be real potential to attract new industry onto the site, but it should be gas.”

 

Thai Companies want to build Power Plant in Cambodia to Supply Electricity to Thailand

 

A group of three leading Thai companies are studying plans to build a 3,660-MW coal-fired power plant in Cambodia to supply electricity to Thailand. The companies have signed a memorandum of understanding to study joint investment in the plant in the Cambodian coastal province of Koh Kong, near the Thai border. The companies include Italian-Thai Development, Electricity Generating EGCO and Ratchaburi Electricity Generating Holding.

Helsinki will stay with Coal for Power and Heat

 

The Helsinki (Finland) City Council on Wednesday approved an energy policy report that sees the city's power and heat stations burning coal for a decade to come. Contrasting with earlier plans, the report says Helsinki will keep using coal in heat and electricity generation beyond the existing coal-burning stations' projected lives. However, the report adds that the possibility of switching the Hanasaari and Salmisaari power and heat stations to pellet or chip is to be looked into.

 

RWE Cancels Proposed Coal-Fired Power Project

 

RWE has cancelled a proposed coal-fired power plant. "We are certainly ready to make investments," RWE boss Ulrich Jobs told the Financial Times Deutschland. "But we will only pursue new projects if economic conditions are back in place." The €2.2-billion (3.3-billion-dollar) project planned in western Saarland, Germany had been withdrawn in November following its defeat in a local referendum (probably the 1,600 MW Ensdorf 4, 5 project). But RWE has now decided against building it elsewhere because the company would have to pay for tradeable carbon emissions quotas for the plant under European Union regulations currently being discussed in Brussels.

 

Pakistan wants 20,000 MW of New Coal-fired Power Plants

 

Prime Minister Mohammedmian Soomro on Wednesday constituted a five-member inter-provincial committee to work out in 10 days a plan for international competitive bidding to produce 20,000 MW of coal-based power by 2019 from coal reserves in Thar, Pakistan. Mr. Soomro said that in order to sustain the pace of economic development the requirement for energy had increased and Thar coal could play a pivotal role in this respect. He said the country had about 185 billion tons of coal reserves and a fast-track strategy should be evolved for its maximum utilization.

 

Can 1,600 MW Kingsnorth proceed without Carbon Capture?

 

There have been reports that the Department for Business may drop conditions that the power project at Kingsnorth (UK) only goes ahead with carbon capture and storage (CCS) provisions. E.ON wants to start building in summer 2008. E.ON said it was possible to draw up proposals to make the site "carbon capture ready" which could allow retrofitting of the technology once it was commercially available, but there was no "current reference for viability at any scale" for CCS.

 

Mercury Market in China by Naiqiang Yan

 

Coal-fired pollutants are the main sources of deteriorated air quality in China. The Chinese government has spent over a decade trying to control these pollutants. Sulfur dioxide has been regarded as the overwhelming primary air pollutant since 1995. The importance of FGD technologies employed at coal-fired utilities has been fully realized by the Chinese Government, and some regulations have been put forward to encourage or persuade utilities to try FGD systems in cooperation with domestic FGD suppliers or overseas suppliers.

 

The overseas suppliers have finally got the run on the domestic suppliers by cooperation with Chinese companies and after about 5-8 years of technology demonstrations and market expansion. By now, over 70 percent of the installed FGD systems in China are partially or fully imported from overseas (from about five to seven overseas suppliers). Core technologies or equipment are still dominated by overseas suppliers although China has earmarked lots of the most experienced native experts of FGD. At present, installing FGD systems has become compulsory for most power plants and industrial utilities. In summary, it has taken about 10 years for the Chinese FGD market to develop from its initiation to wide application.

 

With the expansion of the FGD market, the DeNOx (except for Low NOx Burner technologies) market will gradually be enlarged in the next five years. Though there are about three to five power plants that have installed SCR systems, it is estimated that DeNOx will be more prevalent by 2012 in China. At present, it is still a good opportunity for overseas suppliers to enter the Chinese DeNOx market by cooperation with a Chinese partner.

 

As for mercury control from coal-fired power plants in China, the Chinese government has paid attention to this issue and has begun to encourage Chinese researchers to carry out research, which includes measuring the amount of mercury emissions, mercury emission characteristics in China and how to retrofit the existing Air Pollution Control Devices (e.g. FGD) for mercury control. It is estimated that actions will begin in industrial application by 2010, and the mercury control market is supposed to mature by 2015. However, the market for Mercury analyzers and CEMs is now blooming in China.

 

GAS/OIL – U.S.

 

FirstEnergy to Complete Calpine’s Fremont Energy Center

 

FirstEnergy Generation Corp. plans to purchase a partially complete, 707 MW natural gas-fired combined-cycle generating plant in Fremont, Ohio for $253.6 million. FirstEnergy said the facility, formerly known as Fremont Energy Center LLC, will be purchased from Calpine Corp. Construction began in September 2001 and Calpine has indicated the plant is about 70 percent complete. It could take 12 to18 months and about $150 million to become operational. FirstEnergy has not yet completed its engineering review, which will help it finalize the cost estimate and the timeframe for construction.

 

MMC Chula Vista to use GE Packaged Power Gas Turbines

 

MMC Energy, Inc. is buying two LM-6000 PC Sprint natural gas-fired turbines from GE Packaged Power, Inc. for around $31 million. The turbines will be used in MMC Energy’s Chula Vista Energy Upgrade Project, a 100 MW natural gas-fired power project in San Diego County, California.

 

TIC/Bibb & Associates are EPC Contractors for Bartow Repowering

 

TIC and Bibb and Associates are the EPC Joint Venture partners for the complete design and installation of a 1,200 MW combined cycle plant, the Progress Energy Bartow repowering project in Florida. Mobilization for the new facility is scheduled for January 2007. The facility will consist of four Siemens 501FD combustion turbines powering four Vogt HRSGs and one Mitsubishi 420 MW steam turbine.

 

GAS/OIL – WORLD

 

254 MW Gas Turbine Power Plant in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan

 

The state electric utility Turkmenenergo of Turkmenistan is to sign a contract with the Turkish company Lotus Proje Akaryakit Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon Insaat Sanayi Taahhut ve Ticaret A.S. for the design and construction of a new power station in Ashgabat totaling €120 million. The gas turbine power station will have the capacity of 254 MW. Construction is expected to start in March 2007 and be finished in February 2010.

 

Electrabel to Build Natural Gas-fired Power Plants in Germany

 

Electrabel is examining the details of constructing one or more natural gas-fired combined cycle power plants with capacity of 800 MW in Germany. The plant(s) will be equipped with the best technology that is currently available and will reach efficiency surpassing 57 percent.

 

Goa District, India could build 2 x 250 MW Gas-fired Power Plants

 

The Power Minister Mr. Aleixo Sequeira said the state government was seriously considering  setting up two gas-based power plants of 250 MW in each of the two districts of Goa, India to attain self-sufficiency in the state’s power requirements. Mr. Sequeira told The Navhind Times that the gas requirement for these two plants would be met from the Dabhol-Bangalore gas pipeline.

 

Contact Energy could add another 100 MW Gas Turbine at Stratford, New Zealand

 

Contact Energy is likely to build yet another 100 MW gas turbine station at Stratford, New Zealand in addition to the one announced three months ago. The company says it needs to replace the 300 MW peak load generating capacity of the New Plymouth station, which is now permanently out of service.

Origin to add 126 MW at Mt. Stuart, Australia Power Plant

Origin’s Executive General Manager Major Development Projects Andrew Stock said: “The $92 million power station expansion will provide a 45 percent increase on the output of the existing 288 MW installation at Mt. Stuart, Australia. “Contracts have been signed with GE Energy for the supply of a 126 MW Frame 9E gas turbine generator set. Although Mt. Stuart currently runs on jet fuel, this generator and our existing two turbine generators on site can, in the future, be converted to run on natural gas.”
 

GASIFICATION

 

Peabody Energy/GasPoint Energy Plan Coal-to-Gas Facility in Wyoming

 

Peabody Energy and GasPoint Energy announced plans to build more than one coal-to-natural gas facility in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin. Although the project does not include an electrical generation component, it will likely include carbon capture and sequestration.

 

NUCLEAR

 

Russia Plans 11 GW of New Nuclear Power Plants by 2015

 

Russia wants to put in operation "two GW of nuclear power generation capacity a year" starting from 2012, Peter Shchedrovitskiy, deputy director of the Nuclear Energy Complex, said during a science conference, Itar-Tass reported. At the same time, it is planning to actively build nuclear power plants abroad. By the end of the federal targeted program on the Development of Russia's Nuclear Energy Complex to 2015, "it is planned to put in operation 10 new power generating units with the total capacity of 11 GW." Ten more units will be in various phases of construction, Shchedrovitskiy noted. The total operational capacity of nuclear power plants by 2015 should exceed 33 GW.

 

Murray & Roberts/Westinghouse/Shaw Group to Submit Proposal for Nuclear Power Plant to Eskom

 

Construction group Murray & Roberts, along with its U.S. partner, will submit a proposal for the first new nuclear power station in South Africa to Eskom. “The group in partnership with Westinghouse and Shaw Group from the United States will submit a proposal for a first nuclear power plant and fleet option on January 31,” it said.

 

Murray & Roberts has also secured the construction contract to Hitachi for both the coal-fired Medupi and Bravo boiler contracts (12 units of 750 MW) collectively valued at about R15 billion.

 

Clyde Pumps to supply Pumps for Hongyanhe Ningde Nuclear Power Plants in China

 

Clyde Pumps incorporating Weir Pumps Glasgow, signed a memorandum of understanding with CNPEC (China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.) worth approximately £20 million for the supply of critical safety-related pumps for the Hongyanhe (Units 1 & 2) and Ningde 1,000 MW nuclear power plants currently under construction. These pumps will be delivered progressively through 2009 and 2010.

 

Areva to submit Bid to Eskom for Nuclear Power Plants

 

Areva confirmed on Thursday that it had submitted bids to South African power utility Eskom, which initiated an "invitation to negotiate" in November last year. In a statement, Areva said it had formed a consortium comprising South African engineering and construction group Aveng, French contractor Bouygues and EDF. Areva South Africa chairperson Dr Serge Lafont told Engineering News that its submission related to the ‘Nuclear-1' program, which could involve the construction of a two-unit nuclear power plant, with a capacity of between 3,000 and 3,500 MW. Lafont said it also planned to submit a second bid later this year for the possible ‘fleet' strategy by Eskom, which might result in the construction of 20,000 MW of nuclear capacity by 2025.

 

FP&L Making Case for Nuclear Power Plant Expansion

Florida Power & Light (FPL) began making its case to state regulators on Wednesday that the two nuclear reactors it wants to add at Turkey Point are the best option for keeping South Florida humming. ''Nuclear power is the backbone for FPL's system, providing safe and low-cost energy, 24-7,'' FPL attorney Wade Litchfield told the Public Service Commission, which opened a three-day hearing in Tallahassee on what could be the state's first expansion of nuclear power in decades. FPL is weighing two designs that would more than double output -- 2,200 MW costing $12 billion to $18 billion or 3,000 MW costing $16 billion to $24 billion -- and go online around 2018.

BUSINESS

 

Kansai Electric Power Co. successfully injects CO2 into Coal Beds

 

Japan's Kansai Electric Power Co. is the first to successfully inject carbon dioxide into coal beds. The company said Monday it has succeeded in an experiment to inject a large amount of carbon dioxide into deep coal beds by using nitrogen, Kyodo News reported. The technology is able to put about 6.6 tons of carbon dioxide into the coal beds. Using the nitrogen allows better absorption of the carbon dioxide and enhanced recovery of coal-bed methane. General Environmental Technos Co., a Kansai Electric subsidiary, has been testing the technology in Yubari, Hokkaido since 2004 in a project promoted by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

 

Energias do Brasil hires Maire Tecnimont to build 720 MW Pecem Power Plant

 

Brazilian companies Energias do Brasil and MPX Mineração e Energia have hired Italy’s Maire Tecnimont to build the 720 MW Pecém thermoelectric power plant, Energias do Brasil said in a statement. The plant will go into production in 2011, with a bonus payment if Maire Tecnimont finishes the project ahead of schedule. Total investment in the project is US$1.3 billion and when it goes into operation it will add 720 MW to Energias do Brasil's installed capacity.

 

Global Orchard of Decision Trees Needed to Address Greenhouse Gas Problem

 

Actions taken to address global warming will have impacts on most human activities. By the same token, most human activities impact global warming. Robert McIlvaine of the McIlvaine Company says the ubiquitous nature of this problem demands a new approach. Rather than individual Decision Trees focused on narrow aspects, there is a need for a global orchard of synergistically juxtaposed and fruitful Decision Trees.

 

The pollination from one Decision tree to another will make a huge difference. China generates CO2 to create the goods which California buys. Therefore the Chinese CO2 Reduction Decision Tree is impacted by the California Consumption Reduction Tree.

 

There is presently limited capacity to deliver wind turbines. This impacts not only the Wind Energy Decision Tree but other renewable and fossil energy options.

 

The world’s wealth is finite. Energy, security, healthcare, poverty and other uses of this wealth will be negatively impacted by increases in expenditures to reduce global warming. Pollination between trees will be necessary to obtain the right balance.

 

A small corner of the Global Orchard has been created with a number of Decision Trees developed by the McIlvaine Company. The Power Plant Air Quality Decision Tree is nourished by a powerful mix of communications media depicted as the root system.

 

http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/Tree of Decisions.pdf

 

McIlvaine also has decision systems on wind, solar, biomass and other renewable energy subjects as well as one covering biofuels.  The overview of this Global Orchard shows the juxtaposition of trees for suppliers, investors, consultants, regulators, and operators.

 

http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/Orchard Trees.pdf

 

The benefits of the pollination ability of the orchard are demonstrated with decision recommendations for the operation of coal-fired boilers. Changes to existing coal-fired power plants could cause net reductions of CO2 by 35 percent. Replacement of these plants with new supercritical boilers and the incorporation of other technology could make a net 55 percent reduction.

 

Net CO2 emissions with incremental technology additions including credits as a percent of an existing coal-fired boiler without changes:

 

Technology

Base CO2 Emissions  %       

Efficiency improvements

Co-firing biomass

Waste heat for ethanol

Hydrochloric acid byproduct

Reduction from the combination %

Existing Coal-fired boiler

100

10

5

15

     5

  35

New ultra supercritical coal-fired boiler

70

30% is already

achieved

5

15

     5

  55

 

 

These are net reductions and take into account the CO2 emissions from the whole process of oil exploration through refining and gasoline transportation as opposed to ethanol production using the coal-fired power plant waste heat. The elimination of chloralkali plants and their resultant CO2 contribution is included.

 

The CO2 reduction costs of either retrofitting existing coal-fired power plants or the construction of new supercritical plants is very low compared to renewable energy alternatives or to CO2 capture and sequestration. Furthermore all the technology is in place.

 

The resistance against operating a coal-fired power plant as a chemical plant is symptomatic of the individual Decision Tree thinking. The concept of the coal-fired power plant as a major chemicals producer is possible only with Global Orchard insights.

 

The resistance to any new coal-fired power plant is also individual Decision Tree thinking. When it is accepted that coal will continue to be a major fuel for power plants for the foreseeable future, then it is necessary to apply the Global Orchard view and optimize the mix of new and old plants.

 

For more information on the Global Orchard, click on:  www.mcilvainecompany.com or

E-mail: editor@mcilvainecompany.com

 

 HOT TOPIC HOUR

 

Carbon Cost and Availability were only Two of Many Mercury Issues Discussed in the Mercury Hot Topic Hour Yesterday

 

More than 80 people participated in the Mercury Control Hot Topic Hour yesterday. There was a good mix among questions and answers generated from participants and review of highlights of the DOE NETL Mercury Conference and EUEC Conference.

 

Some of the questions from the utilities are thought provoking. One was triggered by a paper given Thursday at EUEC by Brian Rupp of AEP.

 

Correction: E-Alert 859

 

We received an e-mail from Brian Rupp of AEP correcting a statement in the February 1 (859) E-Alert. Brian says, “I was looking through your web site, and notice a reference to a presentation that I gave at the 2008 EUEC Conference in Tucson in January.  I was not on the Hot Topic Hour Call (Jan. 31) when this was discussed, and I would like to clarify a statement I made, because what I said seems to be misrepresented on the site. Under the heading: Carbon Cost and Availability were only Two of Many Mercury Issues Discussed in the Mercury Hot Topic Hour Yesterday the web site implies that I suggested capturing flyash and carbon separately in the ESP. This was not the case. I was discussing results (and I listened to my presentation again to make sure I am being consistent) that show that carbon in ash is present in a much smaller concentration in the front field of the ESP during normal operation. Carbon in ash becomes more concentrated as you move back into the ESP. This is consistent with many other presentations/papers that I have seen. What I suggested is that by removing and storing the ash from the ESP (not the flue gas) separately by rows, that it may be possible to have ash from the front rows with a low enough carbon content to maintain ash sales. I did not make any reference to capturing ash and carbon separately in the ESP, but rather possibly taking advantage of the fact that they are not captured in equal ratios in all rows of the ESP.”  

 

Participants discussed ways to maximize the salable flyash. Don Hug of Clyde Bergemann advised that this is possible but a limiting factor is the precipitator efficiency requirement.

 

Full scale activated carbon injection (ACI) tests on PRB at AEP were not surprising but bituminous and lignite showed deviations from expectations. In one case longer term deterioration in performance was possibly due to the change in flyash on the collection plates. Mercury and chlorine in the coal varied by orders of magnitude.

 

Gordon Criswell of PPL Montana indicated that testing of carbon injection ahead of the wet particulate/SO2 scrubber showed substantial removal of mercury.

 

Otter Tail Power is faced with mercury control for an existing unit with a pulse jet filter and no scrubber as well as on a new unit with an SCR, pulse jet filter and a wet scrubber. Sid Nelson of Sorbent Technologies explained how the brominated activated carbon acts as a catalyst. Some of the mercury it does not capture will be oxidized and removed in the scrubber. So Otter Tail could minimize carbon consumption in the new unit with the combined capture in the filter and scrubber.

 

Excerpts from the DOE NETL Mercury Conference were used as a launching pad for further discussion. The full text of these papers can be found at

 

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/07/mercury/index.html#overview

 

George Offen of EPRI provided papers at both the NETL and EUEC conference. Some of the areas where EPRI is helping move the technology involve

 

 

Alstom described progress with their Mercure sorbent additive at NETL

 

-Native capture is 27%-50% by AH/ESP and 23 percent by FGD

-Not all of oxidized mercury was captured by FGD

-A large amount of oxidized mercury was reduced to elemental in FGD

-90% of uncontrolled mercury emission was captured at 0.8 lb/MMacf

-90% of input mercury was captured at 0.5 lb/MMacf

-No stack opacity increase during injection

-No leaching of mercury from flyash

-75% of uncontrolled mercury can be removed before ash sales loss

-88% of input mercury may be removed before ash sales loss

 

There was a good discussion of costs and availability of carbon. Sid Nelson of Sorbent Technologies raised the question as to whether carbon could reach $2/lb and noted a recent 70 percent increase by Norit and Calgon Carbon. Calgon Carbon presented data showing hundreds of millions of pounds of increased capacity beyond 2012. On the other hand, Jean Bustard of ADA-ES showed data at EUEC projecting as much as 1 million lb/yr requirement in 2015 if there were new Federal rules. It was agreed that there is flexibility. Brominated carbon will capture more mercury. You can add an extra step in the production to impregnate carbon. So each pound of brominated carbon may be the equivalent of two pounds of untreated activated carbon. However, it was also pointed out that the bromination does not always increase efficiency.

 

Alternative technologies that may not be competitive at $1/lb AC may be more than competitive at $2/lb. So you do have the classic price-sensitive demand.

 

McIlvaine indicated that the Chinese demand would be another factor and displayed the analysis by Naiqiang Yan (appears separately in this Alert).

 

Other Technologies were also discussed Based on Presentations Made at the Two Conferences

 

A URS two year demonstration of the Johnson Matthey gold catalyst is about to begin at LCRA.

 

GE partially gasified coal for 70 percent mercury removal is 75 percent less costly than ACI.

 

Alstom KNX, with bromine, added with the coal results in high removal but some re-emission problems. One of the utilities participating in the Hot Topic Hour volunteered successful KNX testing and no re-emission at his plant.

 

NaHS from B&W improves wet FGD mercury capture by 10-25 percent without adverse effects or re-emission.

 

PowerSpan Eco at First Energy at 30 MW achieves 80-85 percent removal of mercury.

 

Mazyck has demonstrated (at lab scale) a photocatalytic sorbent with 99 percent removal using silica titania material.

 

Praxair PAC from pulverized coal is very effective at the 1-MW level. Tests are continuing with the promise of lower cost than AC.

 

Corning’s honeycomb mercury absorber achieved 90 percent removal in long term testing.

 

BASF (Englehard) mineral-based mercury sorbents derived from flyash and sorbents from molecular sieve materials perform well compared to brominated PAC in some tests but not others. BASF is continuing the research and is optimistic.

 

Agitators and Mixers are “Hot Topics” for February 7

 

The energy required to achieve oxidation of the gypsum slurry is significant. There are various approaches to achieve the quality and minimize cost. On February 7 at 9:00 a.m. CST, experts will build on the excellent presentations made last March and provide updates and new insights. 

 

To find our more about these topics or register, click on:  http://www.mcilvainecompany.com/brochures/FGDnetoppbroch/Default1.htm

 

Upcoming “Hot Topic” Hours

 

February 7, 2008

Oxidation and Mixing

February 21, 2008

Dampers, Expansion Joints (9:00 a.m.)

February 21, 2008

Pumps (1:00 p.m.)

March 6, 2008

Mercury Monitoring

March 13, 2008

SCR Catalysts

March 20, 2008

Particulate Choices for Low Sulfur Coal

March 27, 2008

SO3 Issues and Answers

April 3, 2008

Calcium Reagents

April 10, 2008

Optimization Systems

April 17, 2008

Corrosion Material Options

April 24, 2008

Mercury Control

 

Please see the link below for Recordings of Available Hot Topic Hours

 

Available Recorded Hot Topic Hours

 

 

ACCESSING ALL THE PROJECTS AND INFORMATION ONLINE

 

This Utility E-Alert is part of the Utility Upgrade Environmental Tracking System. The system allows you to instantly retrieve project details, profiles of each coal-fired plant worldwide, the right contacts at the OEM and A/E firms and summaries of all the scheduled FGD and SCR projects. You need a user name and password to access this system. If you have forgotten your user name or password or are not sure whether you are eligible to access this system, email:

editor@mcilvainecompany.com.

 

 

*** The Utility E-Alert is for the exclusive use of the registered subscriber to whom it is electronically delivered. Unauthorized distribution is prohibited. ***

 

 

© 2008 McIlvaine Company