HOT TOPIC HOUR
ZLD 
Options include Crystallization, Spray Drying, and Fixation
The webinar yesterday provided a valuable exchange of 
information among ZLD system and component suppliers.
One of the goals was to compare evaporation/crystallization 
to the spray drier for coal-fired power plants. All agreed that the comparison 
needs to be site specific. In some cases the spray drier is less expensive than 
the evaporation approach but the comparison was limited to FGD wastewater and 
not the entire plant wastewater discharge. 
The evaporator /crystallizer approaches for
Veolia,
GE,
Aquatech, Oasys 
and several others were displayed. The spray dryer approach of
Mitsubishi/Advatech was 
discussed and it was learned that B&W 
and GE are now both offering 
a spray drier system.  The GE system is an
Alstom design which is slated 
for startup soon at Iatan (Missouri).
The ZLD market is far larger than the $250 million/yr. 
which is appearing in many articles. 
China has thousands of coal-fired power plants and 
coal-to-chemicals plants, which will employ  ZLD at a cost of more than $10 
billion.
Chinese power plants have some ZLD systems using 
evaporators but are leaning toward the cheaper route of using flue gas to 
evaporate liquid in the sludge.
The spray drier approach is being pushed by Mitsubishi,
URS, and other international 
companies.
Coal-fired power plants can opt for calcium sulfite 
scrubbing and chemical fixation of sludge rather than gypsum production and 
wastewater treatment. 
The latest intelligence is that local Chinese companies are 
developing their own spray drier technologies and it is likely that this will be 
the option adopted by most plants.
The market for ZLD for shale oil has not slowed as much as 
anticipated due the rule of unintended consequences. Previously the salty 
solution was reinjected into new holes. With fewer new holes the ZLD option has 
blossomed.
The discussion was structured around a quick view of 100 
power points filled with process flow diagrams and cost comparisons. This 
decision guide is intended to help refineries, CTX, and other plant operators 
make the best ZLD decisions.  For coal-fired power plants there are three 
options:
Evaporation and crystallization
Spray dryer with flue gas
Chemical fixation of high liquid containing sludge
Lime-based scrubbing systems without forced oxidation 
create soupy sludge. When these sludges are mixed with lime they encapsulate 
heavy metals and become non leachable landfill.  The same approach can be 
used with gypsum wash residue after filtration. Sargent 
& Lundy analyzed a theoretical 500 MW plant and concluded that fixation 
was the lowest net present value. 
The energy consumption in the evaporation of wastewater is 
an important component. Howden 
discussed options including a turbo blower which is widely used for its 
performance capabilities and energy economy.
Veolia has a process which uses high vacuum and allows 
evaporation at lower temperatures.  This process eliminates the need for 
softening. Millions of dollars needed for chemicals and disposal are eliminated 
even though the energy consumption of the system is somewhat higher.
A number of gas turbine combined cycle power plant are 
using ZLD. The McIlvaine GTCC Supplier Program displays both existing systems 
and new projects.