Trudeau Set to Tack Extra Review onto Kinder Morgan Pipeline
Kinder Morgan Inc.’s proposed Trans
Mountain pipeline expansion is set to face another regulatory hurdle when the
Canadian government unveils new environmental review requirements in the coming
weeks.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet is preparing to detail “transition
plans” for existing pipeline proposals as it moves to strengthen environmental
review laws and give new marching orders to the National Energy Board.
The
plans would in effect tack on additional regulatory requirements that will allow
proposed projects already under review in Canada, including Trans Mountain and
TransCanada Corp.’s Energy East, to meet an unannounced higher standard favored
by Trudeau without restarting the process entirely.
“The government has committed to transition plans for important natural resource
projects while we undertake longer term modernization on the crucial regulatory
agencies on which a considerable portion of our economy and our environment
depends,” Micheline Joanisse, a spokeswoman for Natural Resources Minister Jim
Carr, said in a written statement to Bloomberg, adding more details “will be
provided in the coming weeks.”
The
regulatory overhaul leaves timelines for the $5.4 billion Trans Mountain
expansion in limbo. Hearings resumed for the project this week and an NEB
decision is due in May under the old review system. When asked what the impact
of changes on Kinder Morgan’s timeline would be, one government official
familiar with plans, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the changes
haven’t been announced, said no final decision has been made.
Regulatory Rigor
The
changes could have been more onerous. Trudeau said during last year’s election
campaign the Kinder Morgan process “needs to be redone” and that the review
board wouldn’t be able to meet its approval deadline if his Liberals formed
government. An extended regulatory process would be another setback for Kinder
Morgan, which first proposed its pipeline expansion in 2013 and has faced two
delays already.
“We
have gone through a thorough and rigorous process and have met the timelines,
and we’re hopeful we can continue and finish the process as it’s laid out
today,” Ali Hounsell, a Kinder Morgan spokeswoman, said in an interview. “We’ll
have to see specifically what is announced for a transition plan before we can
assess what the impact is to the project.”
The
Trudeau government intends to overhaul the NEB review process but will need to
pass a new law to do so, the government official said, signaling the scope of
changes being considered.
Speaking January 22 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Trudeau
said he has committed to review Canada’s environmental assessment process so the
country can get “social license for developing our resources, which will allow
us to get our resources to market.”
Pipeline projects continue to be politically divisive in Canada. Montreal Mayor
Denis Coderre -- a former Liberal lawmaker -- this week announced his opposition
to Energy East, sparking a war of words with western political leaders. It’s the
latest sign of opposition to energy development in Quebec, where Trudeau’s
Liberals won 40 of 78 districts in last year’s election.
Environmentalists, meanwhile, are wondering why the review process is continuing
with changes in the offing.
“The dominant feeling is just confusion,” Kai Nagata, a spokesman for the
Dogwood Initiative advocacy group, said in an interview. “People are asking me:
Why are we still going through the hearing as scheduled? Didn’t Trudeau say they
were over?”
Campaign Rhetoric
In
video recorded by the group during the election campaign, Trudeau told Nagata
the NEB overhaul applies to existing proposals and that the Kinder Morgan
project “needs to be redone.” In a follow-up letter to the Dogwood Initiative,
which opposes the pipeline, party president Anna Gainey said the Liberals
“cannot support the pipeline in its current form,” would “replace” the existing
process and modernize the NEB.
However, Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said in November that “projects
initiated under the original system will continue on that path.” That remains
the government’s plan. “No project will be required to return to square one,”
said Joanisse, the natural resources minister’s spokeswoman.
The
Liberals won 17 of 42 seats in British Columbia, through which Kinder Morgan’s
project runs. That result exceeded their previous showing in the western
province in part because they contrasted themselves with the incumbent
Conservative government, which more aggressively championed the energy sector.
‘Full-on Uncertainty’
Conservative lawmaker Candice Bergen, now opposition natural resources critic,
called on Trudeau to detail his proposal and grandfather existing projects, like
Kinder Morgan. “For those almost finished the process, they’re assuming they
won’t be captured in those changes, but it’s just full-on uncertainty,” Bergen
said in an interview January 22. “No one knows.”
Kinder Morgan took note of Trudeau’s comments on the pipeline but, since the
election, has heard “nothing further in terms of clarity of what that might mean
for us,” Hounsell said. The two delays so far were due to rerouting and an NEB
appointment, she said, and the company fears any further changes will have a
cascading effect.
“Even what may seem like a minor delay of a couple of months could add more time
to that on the back end,” Hounsell said, adding the company is proceeding along
the existing process until it hears otherwise.