CFB Scrubber at Basin Electric Dry Fork

Nooter/Eriksen, in partnership with Graf-Wulff, designed, supplied and installed a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) scrubber for Basin Electric Power Cooperative at Dry Fork. This 420-MW PRB coal-fired boiler went on line in June 2011 and has 20 low NOx burners, overfire air and an SCR. This is the largest CFB scrubber system ever built as it is located at an elevation of 4250 feet and with an equivalent volumetric gas flow of a 500-MW boiler located at sea level. This scrubber is designed to reduce SO2 by 95 percent down to 0.06 lb/MMBtu. It also includes the largest of its kind Graf-Wulff lime dry hydration (LDH) system, which is designed to maximize lime reactivity thereby minimizing lime consumption.

The FGD technology selection was decided based on three site-specific parameters — water availability, SO2 collection efficiency, and fuel flexibility. For water consumption, the dry technologies (SDA and CFB) afford distinct advantages over wet FGD as they consume approximately 60 percent less water. For plants like Dry Fork firing low sulfur sub-bituminous PRB coal, SDA is often selected as capital costs are lower than wet FGD and fuel sulfur levels are lower than those for bituminous coals. With SDA, however, SO2 capture is limited by the amount of slaked lime reagent slurry that can be introduced into the absorber vessel through atomizers located at the top of the absorber. Given the stringent SO2 permits limits for Dry Fork and the fact that the coal will come from multiple seams and vary in sulfur content, SDA was deemed insufficient.

CFB FGD technology was deemed to provide an optimum balance of water consumption, SO2 removal efficiency and fuel sulfur content flexibility. Basin Electric thus selected CFB technology offered by Nooter/Eriksen Environmental Technologies.

The CFB absorber vessel is an upflow reactor wherein all reactants are introduced at the bottom of the vessel along with a large portion of particulate solids collected from a downstream fabric filter. SO2 and SO3 enter with the boiler flue gas through multiple venturis, and the lime reagent (first converted to calcium hydroxide) is then introduced to the absorber above the entry point of the flue gas. As the reactants move in turbulent flow to the top of the absorber, the gas is cooled by evaporation of a fine spray of water injected into the absorber. Without peripheral equipment such as rotary atomizers, spray spargers, or mist eliminators, the CFB absorber vessel functions as a “highly-engineered duct” containing only the flue gas, water and fluidized solids.

Residence time for gases entering the tall and narrow CFB absorber is about five seconds providing improved SO2 removal efficiencies within a small absorber footprint. Two lime hydration units are located near the absorber vessel. Lime, low pressure steam and water are injected into the hydration reactor for conversion to calcium hydroxide.

Two fabric filter baghouses, each with three compartments, are located above the absorber vessel to allow recirculation of particulate solids. Nearly all of the components are contained in a single building with a footprint of 190 ft x 100 ft.

During startup, only two major CFB scrubber adjustments were made. Both adjustments focused on optimizing the fluid dynamics and response time within the CFB absorber for the final boiler outlet conditions. Stable operation was maintained through a flue gas flow turndown to 33 percent of full flow. All contracted and permitted emissions have been demonstrated to be below the required permit levels, i.e.:

· SO2 00.7 lb/MMBtu – 12-month rolling average

· HCl 2.05 lb/hr – 12-month rolling average

· PM 0.012 lb/MMBtu – 30-day rolling average

All EPA required emission levels were achieved at lime consumption rates well below (10 percent) contractually required values with no impacts or restrictions on boiler operation, reported Glen Bostick and Steve Moss of Nooter Eriksen Environmental Technologies at Air Quality VIII, fall 2011. Auxiliary power consumption was well below guaranteed values. The fixed rate Lime Dry Hydration (LDH) Unit has been placed in operation, has demonstrated greater than 96 percent conversion of CaO to Ca(OH)2 and has been operated at elevated make rates. Reduced valve trim will be implemented to allow operation at lower demand rates.

 

 

Wuhan Kaidi has 54 FGD Projects in China

Wuhan Kaidi Electric Power Co. has a large share of the FGD projects in China. Current projects in design and construction stages are shown in Figure 1.

Province

Plant Name

Unit ID

Size MW

FGD Startup

FGD Licensor

FGD Reagent

FGD Method

Guangzhou

Henyun

2 units

600

2007

Wulff

lime

CFB

Guangdong

Huilai Phase I

1,2

1200

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Guangdong

Zhanjiang Orimulsion Phase I

2 units

1200

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Guangdong

Zhujiang Phase II

3,4

600

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hebei

Xibeipo Phase III

2 units

1200

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hebei

Yangluo Phase II

2 units

600

2009

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hubei

Ezhou

1

300

2009

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hubei

Ezhou

2

300

2009

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hubei

Huaneng

2 units

1200

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hubei

Huanggang Dabieshan

2 units

1200

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Hubei

Qinshan

1

200

2006

Wulff

lime

CFB

Hunan

Jinzhushan
(Datang Huayin)

2 units

1200

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Inner Mongolia

Baotou 3

2 units

600

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Inner Mongolia

Menghua Huahaibowan Phase III

2 units

660

2006

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Inner Mongolia

Wulashan

2 units

600

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Inner Mongolia

Yuanbaoshan

Phase III

4

600

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Jiangsu

Changshu

1,2

1200

2006

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Jiangsu

Changshu

3

600

2006

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Jiangsu

Xuzhou

1,2

600

2006

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Jiangsu

Yangzhou No. 2

4 units

2400

2006

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Liaoning

Qinshuihe

1

600

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Ningxia

Yingchuan

2 units

 

2006

Wulff

lime

CFB

Shanxi

Fugu Qinshuichuan

Phase I

2 units

600

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Shanxi

Zhangshan

Phase III

2 units

1200

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Sichuan

Huaneng Chongqin Huohuang

2 units

1200

2007

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Tianjin

Chentangzhuang
Phase III

2 units

600

2008

Babcock & Wilcox

limestone

wet

Wulff FGD Orders

Wulff has dry FGD system orders at

·    Yinchuan/Ningxia power plant, China, August 2003 start-up, 85 percent SO2 removal 

·    Zhangshan/Shaanxi power plant, China, 2005 startup, 85-95 percent SO2 removal 

·    Gujiao/Shaanxi power plant, China, 2005 startup, 85-95 percent SO2 removal 

·    Pengcheng/Jiangsui power plant, China, 2005 startup, 85-95 percent SO2 removal.

 

 

Wulff CFB Scrubber

Wulff provides a dry hydrated lime reflux circulating fluidized bed (RCFB) scrubber that can clean flue gas from boilers with capacities of 100 to 300 MW using an absorber module followed by a baghouse or ESP. The simultaneous removal rates of pollutants are SO2 85-99 percent, SO3 >99 percent, HF >99 percent, HCl 95-98 percent, Hg 60-80 percent and particulate >99.9 percent. Wulff advertises this scrubber system has been demonstrated to be reliable, be competitive, have an essentially unlimited removal efficiency, have simultane­ous removal of pollutants, be easy and flexible to operate, and have low operating and invest­ment costs.

Rolf Graf of Wulff Deutschland GmbH, Ales Seitz of Táplarna Strakonice and Xia Fan Gao of Hengyun Enterprises Holding report that a 210 MW system was installed at Guangzhou Hengyun Power Plant with initial start-up of September 2002. Wulff’s Chinese partner was Wuhan Kaidi Electric Power. At the scrubber the flue gas passes through an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) before entering the RCFB absorber and then passes through a second ESP before exiting the stack. The initial sections of the second ESP are designed for recirculating the bulk of the non-reacted sorbent. The flue gas flow rate is 860,000 m3/h, flue gas temperature is 70 to 80° C, and the capacity range is 45-110 percent. Test data at 110 percent capacity showed SO2 was reduced from 1000-2000 mg/m3 to 20-300 mg/m3, SO3 from 20-40 to 0-1 mg/m3, HCl from 80-100 to 4-8 mg/m3, HF from 20-100 to 0-2 mg/m3, and particulate from 36,500 mg/m3 before the initial ESP to 20-60 mg/m3 at the stack. The plant was turned over to plant operators on March 20, 2003.

After completion of the scrubber system at Guangzhou Hengyun, three additional power plants (total of 1800 MW) have ordered six combination CFB scrubber and particulate collection systems. While these orders are for scrubbers in a 300-MW module, Wulff does have up to 700-MW single module scrubbers commercially available.